Template:Did you know nominations/You Don't Know Jack (Facebook game)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 00:47, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

You Don't Know Jack (Facebook game)

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Jellyvision uses writers from Chicago improv tropes to develop new trivia questions weekly for its You Don't Know Jack Facebook game?

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Chic Chocolate

Created/expanded by Masem (talk). Self nom at 13:49, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

It pains me, but I suspect this article would pass WP:GNG. QPQ done. New enough and long enough. No images requiring copyright check. Article reads as neutral enough. [1][2][3] No plagiarism concerns. Hook supported by text which is supported by inline sources. Hook is neutral enough and one of the more interesting facts that wouldn't be promotional.
Article fully supported by sources where required by WP:MOS but not all of this is plot description so a source probably needed: "You Don't Know Jack on Facebook follows a similar format to previous games from the series." This probably needs a source. --LauraHale (talk) 11:03, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Source problem statement. --LauraHale (talk) 11:03, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

I've reused existing sources to quote this line. And just out of curiousity what was your concern on the GNG aspect? --MASEM (t) 12:24, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Some topics I look at for WP:GNG, like video games or web applications where there could be self promotion going on. It has happened at DYK before. :( thus, I do look at some to make sure sources suggest they are notable when article itself may not make it clear. --LauraHale (talk) 12:54, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Sourced as needed. Good to go. --LauraHale (talk) 12:54, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, just was making sure. --MASEM (t) 12:56, 8 July 2012 (UTC)