Template talk:Antisemitism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Jewish history (Rated Template-class)
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.

Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 110#RfC:"Should organisations be included in templates such as Islamophobia, Racism and anti-Semitism"[edit]

I've recently closed an RfC mentioning this template. The RfC was archived, so I thought it best to notify interested editors here. Thanks, I, JethroBT drop me a line 19:09, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Template:Antisemitism & Template:Antisemitism topics[edit]

Should this template and Template:Antisemitism topics have the same articles in them? Each one has articles that the other does not, so maybe it would be best if they two coincide. -Shalom11111 (talk) 00:03, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

I would say either make them completely coincide, or be almost completely disjoint, but having partial overlap is not ideal. Frietjes (talk) 15:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Why not merge them together.-Rainbowofpeace (talk) 02:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Merging them into one template isn't a good option. It needs two templates, just like many other ones. I personally like Frietjes's idea, but how about we put only the most relevant articles in this template, and add many more to Template:Antisemitism topics, expanding it with articles from Category:Antisemitism? Shalom11111 (talk) 23:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Coinciding the two template is the best solution. We need to do the same as seen in the well organized and structured templates Template:Nazism and Template:Nazism sidebar, and also add that note which says "this template exists as alternate version of this template. Any content changes made here should be made there as well." I would appreciate it if someone could go ahead and do this, and if not, then I may at a future time. Shalom11111 (talk) 17:36, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Unusual choice of words[edit]

"Antisemitic canards"?

From Merriam-Webster


a : a false or unfounded report or story; especially : a fabricated report b : a groundless rumor or belief

This template applies canard to terms as disparate as kosher tax and Jewish Lobby.

Many groups have lobbies, including Jewish people.

A better choice would be the more neutral "Antisemitic themes" (talk) 04:01, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Suggestion: Add Doctors' plot?[edit]

Balaenoptera musculus (talk) 15:15, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

I just added Stalinist antisemitism, that will cover the Doctors Plot and other actions. Mangokeylime (talk) 19:14, 5 February 2016 (UTC)


Changing link to Antisemitism (authors) from resources to reference. resources less specifically implies information. reference can also better include information that has a negative view on things like the presentation of anti-Semitism in the media. Gregkaye (talk) 13:54, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

sounds like you should change the lead sentence in Antisemitism (authors) as well? Frietjes (talk) 15:02, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

By region[edit]

We need a section that lists Antisemitism by region, something like this...

Antisemitism by region

Mangokeylime (talk) 19:14, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Comment: See Template:Antisemitism topics, where a section like this exists. This one should remain unchanged. Shalom11111 (talk) 20:48, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Acronym formatting[edit]

"Z.O.G." should be "ZOG" per MOS:ACRO. (talk) 03:19, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

 Done L293D ( • ) 13:50, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Template use at Antisemitism_in_the_UK_Labour_Party article[edit]

Editors here might be interested in the discussion here on the use of this template at the above article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Antisemitism_in_the_UK_Labour_Party#Antisemitism_infobox BobFromBrockley (talk) 12:38, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Add the Barnes Review?[edit]

Seems a good candidate. Doug Weller talk 19:33, 25 June 2019 (UTC)