Template talk:Did you know/Hwacheon Dam

Hwacheon Dam[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Sharktopus ^talk

... that the 1 May 1951 U.S. Navy raid on the Hwacheon Dam (attack pictured) constitutes the only use of aerial torpedoes during the Korean War and their last ever use on a surface target?

Created by NortyNort (talk). Self nom at 07:45, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:

Hook

Length, format, content rules – (176) Hawkeye7 (talk) 12:52, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Source – Hawkeye7 (talk) 12:52, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Interest – Hawkeye7 (talk) 12:52, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image suitability, if applicable – Hawkeye7 (talk) 12:52, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ALT hooks, if proposed –

Article

Length – Hawkeye7 (talk) 12:52, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Vintage – Hawkeye7 (talk) 12:52, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sourcing (V, RS, BLP) – Hawkeye7 (talk) 12:52, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutrality – Hawkeye7 (talk) 12:52, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Plagiarism/close paraphrasing – Hawkeye7 (talk) 12:52, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
copyvio (files) – Hawkeye7 (talk) 12:52, 5 August 2011 (UTC) I also checked both hook sources for CV/CP/plag before moving item to prep. Sharktopus ^talk 17:00, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious faults in prose, structure, formatting –

Comments/discussion:

Looks good. Hawkeye7 (talk) 12:52, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]