Template talk:Drv
This template is meant for articles that are undergoing a Vote for Undeletion after being deleted in the VfD process. This template should be transcluded inside {{vt}} and below the "The result of this vote was ______" line. --Titoxd 01:41, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
- We already have a template called {{TempUndelete}} that performs a similar function. Please redirect this template there and make alterations there or else this one may go on TFD for being redundant. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 01:43, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
- Ok. I misunderstood how you were going to use it. As long as you make a policy proposal and gain consensus to see if users and admins are going to use it. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 01:55, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
- This template has been proposed as policy in VfU's Talk page. --Titoxd 03:18, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
- Ok. I misunderstood how you were going to use it. As long as you make a policy proposal and gain consensus to see if users and admins are going to use it. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 01:55, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
- Since this is designed for deletion debates that have already closed with a delete vote, is a separate template box appropriate? The message should somehow be incorporated into the Vfd Top, in such a way that it doesn't look so bad when seeing the Vfd page from viewing one of the log archives of past vfds Perhaps there should be no separate framed box at all... --Mysidia (talk) 05:09, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- Actually, it is designed for any deletion debate that is closed and being reviewed by Votes for Undeletion/Deletion Review. Incorporating it into the {{at}} template is probably not the best thing, because we don't want all of the deletion discussions brought to VFU/DR. It shouldn't be in articles, like it was the other day. Titoxd(?!?) 05:16, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- The problem is the box makes it look like the standard templates placed at the top of articles, and not like part of the text within a closed Vfd. --Mysidia (talk) 04:47, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
- Actually, it is designed for any deletion debate that is closed and being reviewed by Votes for Undeletion/Deletion Review. Incorporating it into the {{at}} template is probably not the best thing, because we don't want all of the deletion discussions brought to VFU/DR. It shouldn't be in articles, like it was the other day. Titoxd(?!?) 05:16, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
Seeing how nobody ever revisits closed discussion pages, I have redirected this template to the one it was duplicating. One year on no one uses this correctly as intended. Kimchi.sg 05:33, 28 December 2006 (UTC)