Template talk:Google scholar

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Google scholar template.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Google

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Google, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Google and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GoogleWikipedia:WikiProject GoogleTemplate:WikiProject GoogleGoogle articles

WikiProject Google To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Articles for most of the other products listed here and here.
Assess : All articles in the Category:Unknown-importance Google articles and Category:Unassessed Google articles using the project's assessment scale
Expand : Google Mapathon, Google Talkback
Maintain : This WikiProject
Merge : Google mobile services into List of Google products
Stubs : Category:Stub-Class Google articles and Category:Google stubs
Update : List of features in Android and Gmail interface#Product integration. Update logos of Google Marketing Platform products
Other :
- Add more stuff to this to do list if you like! (click here...)
- create:
- Help the Google article for a good article status
- Improve the Outline of Google
- Get more members using :
{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Google/Invite Members}}
- Infobox Images with transparent areas needing a different background color

To-do

Expand the input fields for {{Google scholar}} to include the fields that {{Google scholar cite}} provides. --Teratornis (talk) 06:54, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Error message

Would it be a good idea to suggest {{Google scholar ID}} as a possible substitute if this is used in error within an article? I have a feeling that's going to be the main reason for this error: it's not initially intuitive that the "ID" suffix is necessary. TIA HAND —Phil | Talk 13:06, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]