This template is within the scope of WikiProject Green Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Global Greens on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
cobb campaign of 2004 and nader campaign of '96
Must be someone out there who could write a page for these two campaigns? The cobb link is currently just a section on his own page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eleutherius (talk • contribs) 10:00, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Done This has apparently been done. Bcharles (talk) 05:44, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
is there any reason why the colour has to match up with other templates? I note that the communist party has a template that is red. It makes sense that the green template should be green no? Eleutherius (talk) 08:08, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
yes, your version is harder to read. the color boxes are a compromise. Frietjes (talk) 13:20, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
Is there a version of green that would suit? It seems appropriate to me to have colour that reflects the colours of the organisations being talked about. Eleutherius (talk) 14:27, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
rather not, better to just keep them all the same. the excessive branding can be accomplished through images in the respective articles. Frietjes (talk) 15:54, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
The color was changed to a deep green recently. I changed it to "party shading/green" so that linked text shows more clearly. Bcharles (talk) 05:40, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
@Bcharles: I was the one that changed it, and I like your version better. :-) Me-123567-Me (talk) 05:44, 26 January 2017 (UTC)