Template talk:MLB roster

"Coaches/Other"

That doesn't sound good. Should we just move the 60 day DL and restricted list to the inactive roster section? --Muboshgu (talk) 03:46, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The new below

It's kind of clunky looking. Not to mention, the "More rosters" link takes you to a page with all rosters. Do we need the below? Does it make navigation better? – Muboshgu (talk) 14:27, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would remove it. And judging from the comments of a number of baseball editors on your talk page they probably think it should be removed as well. -DJSasso (talk) 16:02, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I also vote for removing it. — X96lee15 (talk) 16:18, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I also believe this additional navigational aid is unnecessary, and support keeping it out of the team roster navboxes. isaacl (talk) 17:02, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I also vote for removing it and dont know why it was put back in. Spanneraol (talk) 03:41, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TFD it. There is no reason why you would want or need links to other team rosters on any other team's article. It is just bulky clutter and a mass of irrelevant links. Reso lute 15:20, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It sure seems like we should nominate it. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:34, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

stripped div tag

@Blahblah32blahblah, Spanneraol, Charlesaaronthompson, Dmoore5556, NatureBoyMD, Lugubrious DBB, Muboshgu, Abomb8888, Frietjes, WOSlinker, and Izno: Under certain circumstances, such as the call from Draft:2021 Beantown Rangers season, this template generates a stripped </div> tag coming from [[List of Major League Baseball team rosters|All MLB rosters]]</div>. I think the </div> tag needs to be moved closer to the opening <div> tag. —Anomalocaris (talk) 20:26, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anomalocaris, probably fixed now using template:unbulleted list instead. Frietjes (talk) 20:55, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Frietjes: Thanks! —Anomalocaris (talk) 21:12, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]