Template talk:Non-free title-card
 | Template:Non-free title-card is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here. |
Template-protected edit request on 22 September 2016
[edit] | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
There is an extra space after the word "contents" in the first bullet point that needs to be removed. I have sandboxed my proposed change here – see diff.
Mz7 (talk) 04:31, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Done along with some other minor tweaks — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 04:42, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 29 January 2020
[edit] | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
This template can be switched to use {{Uploader information}} if a small change to the bulleted lists is acceptable; I've drafted a new version of the template at Template:Non-free title card/sandbox. Yes, I know I can edit this template myself, but I'd like at least one other person agreeing. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:25, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
- Done — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:40, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 30 June 2023
[edit] | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change "under the Copyright law of the United States" to under the copyright law of the United States".
The word "copyright" is not a proper noun when used in this context. If the text referred to a specific law, such as the Copyright Act of 1976, it would be so, but not when used to generally describe a sect of law in general. OfTheUsername (talk) 23:14, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Completed. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 02:44, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
