Template talk:PAVE US

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States

This template is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Aviation

This template is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

United States

This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States

RfC: Pave Mint link

The PAVE Mint link on the template points to the PAVE § PAVE systems article section which only lists the Pave Mint with a red-link. The link in the template should be made a red-link by removing the piped link to the PAVE article. I could do it myself, but wanted some discussion first. — TadgStirkland⁴⁰¹ (Tadg^Talk) 02:40, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then have some discussion. Thanks for thinking of others first, but I've commented out the Rfc header, as this fails WP:RFCBEFORE, and is wasteful of editor resources to run for a month; just discuss it. Or WP:BE BOLD, make the change, and see if anyone complains. Mathglot (talk) 04:35, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've unpiped the link turning it red per your analysis, which I think is the right one. If others object, feel free to revert, and let us know why you think it is better as a blue link which points to a section which does not have any content about PAVE Mint. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 05:09, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Red links

Another question... Per WP:EXISTING, should this navbox have so many reed links? How quickly are the missing articles being added? — TadgStirkland⁴⁰¹ (Tadg^Talk) 23:10, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]