This template is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Tampa Bay, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tampa Bay on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
He is still part of the Bucs roster, he is just suspended right now, he hasn't been cut. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OneBucPerson (talk • contribs) 01:18, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Please read what people are writing to you. There is no point in keeping Jackson on this roster template, as he can remain suspended forever. Eagles24/7(C) 01:24, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Forrrreeeeevvvvvver. There are plenty of reserve/did not report or reserve/retired guys who stay on rosters for years, even a decade. No need to have Jackson on this roster. Pats1T/C 02:40, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
He's eligible for reinstatement in a few weeks. By then, we should have a better idea.--Giants27(T|C) 01:46, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Denied They remain on the exempt/did not report list. Typically, we keep players on did not report/left squad lists on these roster templates through the end of the season, then we remove them. Pats1T/C 02:28, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Tbbucs77, over the past month your edits regarding the nbsp tags have been reverted several times by three editors, including an administrator who asked you to stop removing them. Despite this, you have continued to do so without any explanation. It has been pointed out to you on the edit summaries that the nbsp tags are used on all other 31 NFL roster templates. They serve the purpose of aligning the player names properly under each other. So I ask you once again to please stop removing them. Thanks. Armchair QB (talk) 21:24, 18 May 2013 (UTC)