Jump to content

Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant

Coordinates: 54°24′56″N 3°30′06″W / 54.4155°N 3.5017°W / 54.4155; -3.5017
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Wavelength (talk | contribs) at 22:20, 4 May 2016 (hyphenating: —> "24-hour" [1 instance]—WP:MOS#Numbers (point 1)—WP:HYPHEN). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant, or THORP, is a nuclear fuel reprocessing plant at Sellafield in Cumbria, England. THORP is owned by the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority and operated by Sellafield Ltd (which is the site licensee company). Spent nuclear fuel from nuclear reactors is reprocessed to separate the 96% uranium and the 1% plutonium, which can be reused in mixed oxide fuel, from the 3% radioactive wastes, which are treated and stored at the plant. The uranium is then made available for customers to be manufactured into new fuel.

THORP is due to close in 2018 once all existing reprocessing contracts have been fulfilled.[1]

History

Construction of THORP started in the 1970s, and was completed in 1994. The plant went into operation in August 1997.

Between 1977 and 1978 an inquiry was held into an application by British Nuclear Fuels plc for outline planning permission to build a new plant to reprocess irradiated oxide nuclear fuel from both UK and foreign reactors. The inquiry was to answer three questions: "1. Should oxide fuel from United Kingdom reactors be reprocessed in this country at all; whether at Windscale or elsewhere? 2. If yes, should such reprocessing be carried on at Windscale? 3. If yes, should the reprocessing plant be about double the estimated site required to handle United Kingdom oxide fuels and be used as to the spare capacity, for reprocessing foreign fuels?". The result of the inquiry was that the new plant, the Thermal Oxide Reprocessing Plant, was given the go-ahead in 1978, although it was not completed until the 1990s at a cost of £1.8 billion.[2]

In 1998/99, the plant faced severe economic difficulties when it failed to reach its reprocessing targets. Shut-downs for six months in the first half of 1998 and for several further months from December 1998, due to leakages, resulted in a failure to achieve the target of reprocessing 900 tonnes of fuel over that period. Most of the reprocessing contracts were with Germany and Japan.[2]

Design features

The chemical flowsheet for THORP is designed to add less non-volatile matter to the first cycle PUREX raffinate, one way in which this is done is by avoiding the use of ferrous compounds as plutonium reducing agents. In this plant the reduction is done using either hydrazine or HAN (hydroxylamine nitrate). The plant releases gaseous emissions of Krypton-85, a radioactive Beta-emitter with a half-life of 10.7 years. The Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland (RPII) commenced 24-hour atmospheric monitoring for Krypton-85 in 1993, prior to the plant's commissioning.[3][4]

The cooled oxide fuel is chopped up in the Shear Cell and the fuel dissolved in Nitric Acid. It is chemically conditioned before passing to the chemical separation plant. Pulsed columns (designated HA/HS) are used to initially separate the majority of the Uranium and Plutonium from the fission products by transferring them into the solvent phase, which comprises Tri-butyl phosphate in odourless kerosene (TBP/OK). The transfer is done in the HA column with the HS column providing further removal of fission products. 2 further pulsed columns (designated BS/BX) and a mixer/settler assembly (1BXX) then separate the Uranium and Plutonium into separate streams. Plutonium is reduced to the 3 valency state, which is insoluble in the solvent phase so ends up in the aqueous phase exiting the 1BX column.

The 1BXX mixer/settler completes the removal of Pu from the solvent phase. The 1BS column removes any remaining Uranium from the aqueous phase by the use of fresh solvent.

Pulsed columns then purify the Plutonium, removing the troublesome fission products that remain. A mixer/settlet (1C) is used to transfer (washes) the Uranium across to the aqueous phase ready for the next stage. Uranium purification is achieved using 3 mixer settlers (UP1 - UP3) similar to those in use on the existing Magnox reprocessing plant (B205). Evaporation of the 2 product streams then occurs before further processing is undertaken. Uranium is converted to UO3 powder while the Plutonium is converted to PuO2 powder and sent to storage.

Pulsed columns were chosen to avoid the risk of a criticality incident occurring within the plant. This can happen if sufficient fissile material comes together to start an uncontrolled chain reaction, producing a large release of neutrons. The risks and mechanisms are well understood and the plant design is arranged to prevent its occurrence, i.e. intrinsically safe.

2005 leak

On 9 May 2005 it was announced that THORP suffered a large leak of a highly radioactive solution, which first started in July 2004. British Nuclear Group's board of inquiry determined that a design error led to the leak, while a complacent culture at the plant delayed detection for nine months. Operations staff did not discover the leak until safeguards staff reported major fluid accountancy discrepancies.

Altogether 83 cubic metres (18,250 imperial gallons) of nitric acid solution leaked from a small fractured feedpipe, which was discovered when a remote camera was sent in to examine THORP's Feed Clarification Cell on 19 April 2005. All the fluids collected under gravity into the secondary containment, which is a stainless steel tub embedded in 2 metre thick reinforced concrete, capable of holding 250 cubic metres of fluids.

The solution from the spill was estimated to contain 20 metric tons of uranium and 160 kilograms of plutonium. The leaked solution was safely recovered into primary containment using originally installed steam ejectors. Radiation levels in the cell preclude entry of humans and robotic repair of the fractured pipe is expected to be difficult. Officials are considering bypassing the faulty tank to resume operations.

The pipe fractured due to lateral motion of an accountancy tank, which measures volume by weight and moves horizontally and vertically in the process. The tank's original design had restraint blocks to prevent lateral motion, but these were later removed from the design for seismic uncoupling. However it appears this design change was not evaluated for fatigue, and it is inconceivable a proper review would have permitted this change.

The incident was classified as Level 3 out of 7 on the International Nuclear Event Scale (INES), a "serious incident", due to the amount of radioactive inventory that leaked from primary to secondary containment without discovery over a number of months.[5] This was initially considered by BNFL to be surprisingly high, but the specifications of the scale required it.

No radioactive material leaked to the environment and no one was injured.

Return to service will be dependent on appropriate modification proposals and any further regulatory requirements resulting from the ongoing investigations. As of March 2006 various restart and closure options were still being considered.[6]

The British Nuclear Group was convicted for breaches of health and safety regulations following the accident, and fined £500,000.[7]

Production eventually restarted at the plant in early 2008 but almost immediately had to be put on hold again, for the repair of an underwater lift that moves fuel for reprocessing.[8]

See also

Other reprocessing sites

References

  1. ^ "Sellafield Thorp site to close in 2018". BBC News Cumbria. BBC. Retrieved 22 August 2012.
  2. ^ a b Brown, Paul (1 April 1999), "Sellafield says don't blame Thorp for cuts", The Guardian, UK, p. 27
  3. ^ "Risk doubles for 'heavy' fish eater". The Irish News. 16 January 1995. Retrieved 1 May 2015 – via Highbeam Research.
  4. ^ McDonald, Frank (7 January 1995). "Report says radon a more serious threat than Sellafield plant". The Irish Times. Retrieved 2 May 2015 – via Highbeam Research.
  5. ^ [1] Archived 2007-09-28 at the Wayback Machine
  6. ^ [2][dead link‍]
  7. ^ Wilson, James (17 October 2006). "Sellafield criticised on safety as BNG fined". FT.com. Retrieved 4 February 2013.
  8. ^ Geoffrey Lean, 'Shambolic' Sellafield in crisis again after damning safety report, The Independent, 3 February 2008.


54°24′56″N 3°30′06″W / 54.4155°N 3.5017°W / 54.4155; -3.5017

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thermal_Oxide_Reprocessing_Plant&oldid=718670539"