Truism: Difference between revisions
m Reverted edits by 198.96.22.158 (talk) to last version by NewEnglandYankee |
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
# An undoubted or self-evident truth; a statement which is pliantly true; a proposition needing no proof or argument; -- opposed to falsism. [http://www.websters-online-dictionary.org/credits/websters1913.html# Websters].}}</ref> |
# An undoubted or self-evident truth; a statement which is pliantly true; a proposition needing no proof or argument; -- opposed to falsism. [http://www.websters-online-dictionary.org/credits/websters1913.html# Websters].}}</ref> |
||
In [[philosophy]], a sentence which asserts incomplete truth conditions for a proposition may be regarded as a truism. An example of such a sentence would be "Under appropriate conditions, the sun rises." Without contextual support{{spaced ndash}}a statement of what those appropriate conditions are{{spaced ndash}}the sentence is true but incontestable. A statement which is true by definition ("All cats are mammals.") would also be considered a truism. This is quite similar to a [[tautology (logic)|tautology]] in which the conclusion of a statement is essentially equivalent to its premise, a statement that is "true by virtue of its [[logical form]] alone".<ref>http://cougar.eb.com/dictionary/tautologous</ref> |
In [[philosophy]], a sentence which asserts incomplete truth conditions for a proposition may be regarded as a truism. An example of such a sentence would be "Under appropriate conditions, the sun rises." Without new egalitarianism to be the best of all time low and behold to the day after a while contextual support{{spaced ndash}}a statement of what those appropriate conditions are{{spaced ndash}}the sentence is true but incontestable. A statement which is true by definition ("All cats are mammals.") would also be considered a truism. This is quite similar to a [[tautology (logic)|tautology]] in which the conclusion of a statement is essentially equivalent to its premise, a statement that is "true by virtue of its [[logical form]] alone".<ref>http://cougar.eb.com/dictionary/tautologous</ref> |
||
The word may also be used with a different sense in [[rhetoric]], to disguise the fact that a proposition is really just an [[opinion]]. Similarly, stating an accepted truth about life in general can also be called a truism. |
The word may also be used with a different sense in [[rhetoric]], to disguise the fact that a proposition is really just an [[opinion]]. Similarly, stating an accepted truth about life in general can also be called a truism. |
||
Revision as of 18:58, 14 May 2015
A truism is a claim that is so obvious or self-evident as to be hardly worth mentioning, except as a reminder or as a rhetorical or literary device, and is the opposite of falsism.[1]
In philosophy, a sentence which asserts incomplete truth conditions for a proposition may be regarded as a truism. An example of such a sentence would be "Under appropriate conditions, the sun rises." Without new egalitarianism to be the best of all time low and behold to the day after a while contextual support – a statement of what those appropriate conditions are – the sentence is true but incontestable. A statement which is true by definition ("All cats are mammals.") would also be considered a truism. This is quite similar to a tautology in which the conclusion of a statement is essentially equivalent to its premise, a statement that is "true by virtue of its logical form alone".[2]
The word may also be used with a different sense in rhetoric, to disguise the fact that a proposition is really just an opinion. Similarly, stating an accepted truth about life in general can also be called a truism.
See also
 Look up truism in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
|
References
- ^ "Definition: truism". http://www.websters-online-dictionary.org/: Webster's Online Dictionary. Retrieved 2010-03-10.
Noun Base (truism)
- ^ http://cougar.eb.com/dictionary/tautologous