United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review
United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review | |
---|---|
Location | Washington, D.C. |
Established | 1978 |
The United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review (FISCR) is a U.S. federal court whose sole purpose is to review denials of applications for electronic surveillance warrants (called FISA warrants) by the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (or FISC). The FISCR was established by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (known as FISA for short) and consists of a panel of three judges. Like the FISC, the FISCR is not an adversarial court; rather, the only party to the court is the federal government, although other parties may submit briefs as amici curiae if they are made aware of the proceedings. Papers are filed and proceedings are held in secret. Records of the proceedings are kept classified, though copies of the proceedings with sensitive information redacted are very occasionally made public. The government may appeal decisions of the FISCR to the Supreme Court, which hears appeals on a discretionary basis.
There is no provision for review or appeal of a grant of a warrant application, only of a denial. That is because in both the FISC and the FISCA, the government - the party who seeks a warrant to conduct surveillance - is the only party before the court, and it is unusual for anyone else to become aware of the warrant application in the first place.
The judges of the Court of Review are district or appellate federal judges, appointed by the Chief Justice of the United States for seven-year terms. Their terms are staggered so that there are at least two years between consecutive appointments. A judge may be appointed only once to either the FISCR or the FISC.
Notable cases
In re Sealed Case
The FISCR was called into session for the first time in 2002 in a case referred to as In re: Sealed Case No. 02-001. The FISC had granted a FISA warrant to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) but had placed restrictions on its use; specifically, the FBI was denied the ability to use evidence gathered under the warrant in criminal cases. FISCR allowed a coalition of civil liberties groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, to file amicus briefs opposing the FBI's new surveillance programs. The FISCR held that the restrictions that the FISC had placed on the warrant violated both FISA and the USA PATRIOT Act and that there was no constitutional requirement for those restrictions.
In re Directives
In August 2008, the FISCR affirmed the constitutionality of the Protect America Act of 2007 in a heavily redacted opinion, In re Directives [redacted text] Pursuant to Section 105B of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, released on January 15, 2009.[1][2][3] In re Directives was only the second such public ruling since FISA's enactment.[4]
Composition
Current membership
Name | Court | Date appointed | Term expiry | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
William Curtis Bryson (presiding) | Federal | May 19, 2011 Sept. 10, 2013 (presiding) |
May 18, 2018 | [5][6] |
José A. Cabranes | Second | August 9, 2013 | May, 2020 | [7][8] |
Richard C. Tallman | Ninth | January 27, 2014 | January 26, 2021 | [9] |
Former members
Name | Court | Date appointed | Term expiry | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Morris S. Arnold | Eighth | May 19, 2008 May 19, 2012 (presiding) |
Aug. 31, 2013 | [5][6][10] |
Bruce Marshall Selya | First | October 8, 2005 May 19, 2008 (presiding) |
May 18, 2012 | [5] |
Ralph K. Winter, Jr. | Second | November 14, 2003 | May 18, 2010 | [5] |
Edward Leavy | Ninth | September 25, 2001 May 19, 2005 (presiding) |
May 18, 2008 | [5] |
Ralph B. Guy, Jr. | Sixth | October 8, 1998 May 19, 2001 (presiding) |
May 18, 2005 | [5] |
Laurence H. Silberman | D.C. | June 18, 1996 | May 18, 2003 | [5] |
Paul Hitch Roney (presiding) | Eleventh | September 13, 1994 | May 18, 2001 | [5][11] |
Bobby R. Baldock | Tenth | June 17, 1992 | May 18, 1998 | [5] |
Robert W. Warren | E.D. Wis. | October 30, 1989 | May 18, 1996 | [5] |
Collins J. Seitz (presiding) | Third | March 19, 1987 | March 18, 1994 | [5] |
Edward Skottowe Northrop | D. Md. | January 11, 1985 | January 10, 1992 | [5] |
John A. Field | Fourth | May 19, 1982 | May 18, 1989 | [5] |
A. Leon Higginbotham, Jr. (presiding) | Third | May 19, 1979 | May 18, 1986 | [5] |
James E. Barrett | Tenth | May 19, 1979 | May 18, 1984 | [5] |
George MacKinnon | D.C. | May 19, 1979 | May 18, 1982 | [5] |
- Note that the start dates of service for some judges conflict among sources.
References
- ^ In re Directives [redacted text] Pursuant to Section 105B of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, no. 08-01 (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review, Jan 15, 2009)
- ^ Risen, James; Lichtblau, Eric (January 16, 2009). "Court Affirms Wiretapping Without Warrants". New York Times, January 15, 2009. Retrieved January 16, 2009.
- ^ Perez, Evan (January 16, 2009). "Court Backs U.S. Wiretapping". Wall Street Journal, January 16, 2009. Retrieved January 16, 2009.
- ^ "Intelligence Court Releases Ruling in Favor of Warrantless Wiretapping". Washington Post, January 15, 2009. January 16, 2009. Retrieved January 16, 2009.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p
- Savage, Charles (May 2013). "Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court / Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review: Current and Past Members". The New York Times. Archived from the original on July 26, 2013. Retrieved July 26, 2013.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - Savage, Charlie (July 25, 2013). "Roberts's Picks Reshaping Secret Surveillance Court". The New York Times. Retrieved July 26, 2013.
- Savage, Charles (May 2013). "Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court / Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review: Current and Past Members". The New York Times. Archived from the original on July 26, 2013. Retrieved July 26, 2013.
- ^ a b https://fas.org/blogs/secrecy/2013/09/response-lags/
- ^ Barnes, Robert (August 19, 2013). "Roberts names judge to panel that hears rare appeals of surveillance court rulings". The Washington Post. Retrieved August 19, 2013.
- ^ Savage, Charlie (August 20, 2013). "Roberts Varies Pattern in Choice for Spy Court". The New York Times. Retrieved August 20, 2013.
- ^ Aftergood, Steven (7 February 2014). "FISA Court Appointments, Potential Reforms, and More from CRS". Secrecy News. Retrieved 7 February 2014.
- ^ 2013 membership
- ^ "Judge Paul H. Roney". http://web.archive.org/web/20060923115648/http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/about/judges/roney.php. Archived from the original on September 23, 2006. Retrieved 2013-06-14.
{{cite web}}
: External link in
(help); Unknown parameter|publisher=
|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help)
Further reading
- "Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and Court of Review 2014 Membership". from the Federation of American Scientists. Retrieved February 7, 2014.
- Risen, James; Lichtblau, Eric (January 16, 2009). "Court Affirms Wiretapping Without Warrants". New York Times, January 15, 2009. Retrieved January 16, 2009.
- Perez, Evan (January 16, 2009). "Court Backs U.S. Wiretapping". Wall Street Journal, January 16, 2009. Retrieved January 16, 2009.
- "Intelligence Court Releases Ruling in Favor of Warrantless Wiretapping". Washington Post, January 15, 2009. January 16, 2009. Retrieved January 16, 2009.
- "Court ruling endorses Bush surveillance policy". Associated Press, January 15, 2009. Retrieved January 16, 2009.
- Pudlow, Jan (September 1, 2000). "Nixon era judges celebrate 30 years on the bench". The Florida Bar News, September 1, 2000. Retrieved September 30, 2012.
External links
- Rules of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review, via Federation of American Scientists
- The Department of Justice brief on Case No. 02-001, redacted version, via Federation of American Scientists
- FISCOR Hearing transcript on 02-001, via Federation of American Scientists
- The Court of Review's Decision on "In re: Sealed Case No. 02-001", from Findlaw