Jump to content

User:Szyslak/Current projects

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GM brands

[edit]
Timeline of General Motors marques and predecessor companies, 1893-present -
Home
Market
1890s 1900s 1910s 1920s 1930s 1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
U.S. Buick Buick WWII Buick
Cadillac Cadillac Cadillac
Chevrolet Chevrolet Chevrolet
Elmore
Geo
Rapid-GMC
Reliance
Hummer
LaSalle
Marquette
Oakland
Oldsmobile
Pontiac
Saturn
Viking
Europe / U.K.
Bedford
Opel
Ranger (Europe)
Saab
Vauxhall
Australasia
Holden
Statesman
Canada only
Acadian
Asuna
Other
ZA Ranger
Time 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1890s 1900s 1910s 1920s 1930s 1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s


Beatles timeline

[edit]
Line-up of bands preceding The Beatles, March 1957 – August 1960
Principal
instrument
1957 1958 1959 1960
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Guitar John Lennon John Lennon
Eric Griffiths
Rod Davis
Paul McCartney Paul McCartney
George Harrison George Harrison
Banjo Rod Davis
Tea chest
bass
Bill Smith
Len Garry
Washboard Pete Shotton
Piano John Charles Lowe
Bass guitar Les Stewart
Ken Brown
Stuart Sutcliffe
Drums Colin Hanton
Ken Brown
Tommy Moore
Norman Chapman
Line-up of The Beatles, August 1960 – 1996
Principal
instrument
1960s 1970s April 1970 – 1994 1990s
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 4 5 6
Guitar John Lennon Inactive
McCartney
George Harrison Harrison
Bass guitar Stuart Sutcliffe
Paul McCartney McCartney
Drums Pete Best
Ringo Starr Starr

Line-up of bands preceding The Beatles, March 1957 – August 1960

Beatles covers

[edit]

See The Beatles discography

Studio albums

[edit]

UK studio albums

[edit]

U.S. studio albums

[edit]

Canadian studio albums

[edit]

Compilations

[edit]

UK/international compilations

[edit]

U.S. compliations

[edit]

Canadian compilations

[edit]

EPs

[edit]

UK EPs

[edit]

U.S. EPs

[edit]

Singles

[edit]

UK singles

[edit]

U.S. singles

[edit]

Canadian singles

[edit]

Back covers, LP labels, etc.

[edit]

Are these necessary? I may list them for deletion.

Los Angeles neighborhoods

[edit]

Many of these articles could use a lot of work, especially those concerning lesser-known neighborhoods.

Tagged for cleanup, NPOV, etc.

[edit]

(as of 02:12, 24 October 2006 (UTC))

Cleanup

[edit]

Does not cite sources

[edit]

Many more articles need cleanup and NPOV help, though.

Demographic info

[edit]

This includes Rambot-style demographic/census statistics, not generalized statements such as "an increasing Korean-American population"

Articles with no demographic info

[edit]

Articles with some demographic info

[edit]

General goals

[edit]
  • Rambot-style demographic info for each article, when available, except for the smallest districts/neighborhoods
  • Removal of original research and unverifiable claims (e.g. "the best Italian restaurant in such-and-such neighborhood", etc.)
  • Watch out for "civic boosterism" and real-estate sales language

Template for demographic info

[edit]

DISTRICT lies in census tracts TRACTS. As of the [[census]]{{GR|2}} of 2000, there were # people, # households, and # families residing in the district. The [[population density]] was #/km² (#/mi²). There were # housing units at an average density of #/km² (#/mi²). The [[Race (U.S. Census)|racial makeup]] of the district was WHITE% White, BLACK% African American, NA% Native American, ASIAN% Asian, PI% Pacific Islander, OTHER% from other races, and TWOMORE% from two or more races. HISP% of the population were Hispanic or Latino of any race, and NHWHITE% of whites were not of Hispanic origin. There were # households out of which UNDER18% had children under the age of 18 living with them, COUPLES% were [[Marriage|married couples]] living together, FHOUSE% had a female householder with no husband present, and NFAMILY% were non-families. IND% of all households were made up of individuals and 65ALONE% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was HOUSESIZE and the average family size was FAMSIZE. In the district the population was spread out with UNDER18% under the age of 18, 1824% from 18 to 24, 2544% from 25 to 44, 4464% from 45 to 64, and 65PLUS% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was MEDAGE years. For every 100 females there were MALES males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were MALES males. The median income for a household in the district was $MEDINCOME, and the median income for a family was $MEDFAMILY. Males had a median income of $MALEINCOME versus $FEMALEINCOME for females. The [[per capita income]] for the city was $PERCAPINCOME. About FAMPOVLINE% of families and POPPOVLINE% of the population were below the [[poverty line]], including 18UNDERPOVLINE% of those under age 18 and 65OVERPOVLINE% of those age 65 or over.

See also

[edit]

RFA

[edit]

My RFA criteria: I won't oppose an RFA unless I have a really good reason.

Some things I don't care about:

  • How many featured articles a user has. I agree with the 1FA criterion on one point: someone who writes featured articles is generally a good admin candidate. However, that's no reason to deny adminship to anyone who hasn't gotten an article to FA status.
  • Whether someone used the word "vote" once or twice. I've slipped into that term before to refer to AFD, RFA and similar processes, but I fully support and understand m:Polls are evil. However, there is a problem when a candidate has shown a severe misunderstanding of rough consensus (e.g. claiming a page on AFD should be deleted because the raw count was 13 delete, 12 keep), or has made comments such as "If I am elected administrator..."
  • Edit count in particular namespaces, such as templates or categories. When most users speak of "a good balance of edits in different namespaces", they mean the candidate doesn't just do one thing, and has a good background in important aspects of Wikipedia editing and maintenance. For example, if a user has 5000 edits, that's generally a good thing. But if the edits are all to AFD pages, that's not so good. A user doesn't need an extensive history in all conceivable areas of Wikipedia to be a good admin. RFA comments like "not enough category edits" make as much sense as, say, "not enough MediaWiki talk edits".