User:Ukglo
Appearance
Hello. I'm this person.
From time to time, I'm editing articles along two main themes:
- Rephrase information about objects from history so that the articles about them don't sound like the British imperial forces and associated officers "discovered" things. More that they excavated and removed things. For example the Lion of Knidos article.
- Rephrase information about slavery, in particular, changing uses of the word "slave" to read "enslaved person"[1], using the word "slave" dehumanises the human that was owned by someone, for example, the Akan Drum article.
I am gradually reviewing all the objects held by the British Museum and listed in the handy widget at the bottom of the Akan Drum page. It's shocking how little we know about the colonised lives of some of these things, and I would rather not celebrate the "gentleman collectors" and "diplomats" of the British empire such as Henry Salt by claiming they were the first to discover important cultural artifacts in other countries.
Wondering if I can insert a template in here?
I would welcome anyone's help shifting the language away from this "lingering imperialism" which is so offensive these days.
Possibly related work:
- ^ Waldman, Katy. "Slave or Enslaved Person?". Slate. Retrieved 9 June 2021.