Jump to content

User:WyldEys/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Creating new subpages (from teahouse 11/21):

You can use the form below to quickly open the edit form for a new subpage.


Help topics:

Help:Maintenance template removal

Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Before starting the process

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Undisclosed_paid

Add this tag to articles for which there appears to be a significant contribution by an undisclosed paid editor. When placing this tag, please also tag the article talk page with {{Connected contributor (paid)}}.

Maintenance templates

Help:Sorting

When to remove[edit]

[edit]

Maintenance templates are not meant to be in articles permanently. Any user without a conflict of interest may remove a maintenance template in any of the following circumstances:

  1. When the issue has been adequately addressed;
  2. Upon determining that the issue has been resolved (perhaps by someone else);
  3. If it reasonably appears that the template did not belong when placed or was added in error. Consider first discussing the matter with the original placer of the template (unless this user is no longer active on Wikipedia). In any case, if the issue appears contentious, seek consensus on the talk page;
  4. When an article talkpage discussion has not been initiated (for templates requesting it);
  5. When there is consensus on the talk page (or elsewhere) as to how to address the flagged issue, and you are reasonably implementing those changes. (It is good practice to note the location of the consensus in the edit summary accompanying your removal, ideally with a link to the location);
  6. When it can reasonably be concluded that the template is no longer relevant, such as a {{Current}} template appearing in an article that no longer documents a current event;
  7. If the maintenance template is of a type that requires support but is not fully supported. For example: Neutrality-related templates such as {{COI}} (associated with the conflict of interest guideline) or {{POV}} (associated with the neutral point of view policy) strongly recommend that the tagging editor initiate a discussion (generally on the article's talk page) to support the placement of the tag. If the tagging editor failed to do so, or the discussion is dormant, and there is no other support for the template, it can be removed;
  8. You may remove a template when according to your best judgement the lack of edits and/or talk page discussion should be interpreted as the issue not worth fixing (as a form of "silent consensus"). Please note there is currently no consensus for general age-related removal of maintenance templates - that is, removing a template purely or chiefly because it is old is not considered a sufficient argument. Exception: removing POV-related templates whose discussions have gone dormant is encouraged, as addressed in the bullet point immediately above;
  9. Lastly, there are times when a person attempting to address a maintenance template that flags some fundamental matter may find that the issue cannot actually be addressed. For example, if an article is flagged as lacking citations to reliable, secondary sources, written by third-parties to the topic, and a user seeing the maintenance templates discovers that such sources appear not to exist, that usually means the article should be deleted. In such cases, it is not so much that the template does not belong and should be removed, but rather that flagging the page for maintenance will never address the more critical issue that the page itself does not belong on Wikipedia at all.

When not to remove[edit]

[edit]

You should not remove maintenance templates if any of the following apply:

  1. You do not understand the issues raised by the template;
  2. The issue has not yet been resolved;
  3. There is ongoing activity or discussion related to the template issue;
  4. The problem that the maintenance template flags is plainly and unambiguously required for a proper article under Wikipedia's policies and guidelines;
  5. You have been paid to edit the article or have some other conflict of interest [exceptions apply: see individual template documentation].


Main category link: Category:Wikipedia articles with undisclosed paid content

Category:Wikipedia articles with undisclosed paid content from October 2021

Category:Wikipedia articles with undisclosed paid content from November 2021

Article Talk Page Date of flag Notes Status
Hesham Abdul Wahab Talk:Hesham Abdul Wahab Oct. 2021 Flag was added by anonymous editor but doesnt seem to be warranted? On second review, almost the entire page (86%) was written by two editors (Srijit777 and Crazyjibin) Page statistics 1
American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Talk:American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Nov. 2021 Nothing was posted on the talk page about the flag 1
Brent Coon Talk:Brent Coon Nov. 2021 Page was deleted 10
Paul W. Draper Talk:Paul W. Draper Nov. 2021 Nothing on identified on the talk page, but the article clearly needs to be changed. Probably a good one to work on putting together a completely revised version. Reviewing and revising the whole article should address the flag even without identifying any users. User:WyldEys/Paul Draper edits. This article needs more work, a lot of the references are junk. 4 - Currently working here
Benjamin Gilmour Talk:Benjamin Gilmour Nov. 2021 Nothing was posted on the talk page about the flag, but created all by one editor. 1
Mark Gordon (producer) Talk:Mark Gordon (producer) Nov. 2021 Nothing was posted on the talk page about the flag 1
Kate Hoang Talk:Kate Hoang Nov. 2021 Page was deleted 10
International Fruit and Vegetable Juice Association Talk:International Fruit and Vegetable Juice Association Nov. 2021 Nothing was posted on the talk page; no talk page currently exists 1
International Institute for Conservation Talk:International Institute for Conservation Nov. 2021 Nothing was posted on the talk page about the flag 1
Kentico Xperience Talk:Kentico Xperience Nov. 2021 Nothing was posted on the talk page about the flag. Appears to be actively being reviewed and edited, come back to this one. There is an edit request waiting review on the talk page. 9
Phil McGraw Talk:Phil McGraw Nov. 2021 Editor to review: ARainbowofHues (identified on talk page when flag was added). Need some time to look through all of this one, a lot of activity on the talk page recently 9
MIFA Allstars Ontario Talk:MIFA Allstars Ontario Nov. 2021 Page was deleted 10
Tariq Nasheed Talk:Tariq Nasheed Nov. 2021 Actively being worked on 9
Victor Ngumah Talk:Victor Ngumah Nov. 2021 Page was deleted 10
RattanIndia Talk:RattanIndia Nov. 2021 Page was deleted 10
SmithBucklin Talk:SmithBucklin Nov. 2021 Nothing was posted on the talk page about the flag 1
Sawandi Wilson Talk:Sawandi Wilson Nov. 2021 Page was deleted 10
Black Cube Talk:Black Cube Oct. 2021 Editor was identified on the talk page. I reviewed the edits and provided suggestions. Article looks a little controversial, so I don't have much interest to keep pushing here. 5 - Waiting for response to review, implement changes, and remove flag.
Curiosity Stream Talk:Curiosity Stream Nov. 2021 Editors were identified on the talk page. I started a request for comment but it was cancelled (wrong avenue). I received input from someone else with additional suggestions. I drafted changes here and posted to talk page. 5 - Waiting for response to review and implement my changes.
Sofinnova Talk:Sofinnova Oct. 2021 No explanation was provided, but was obvious. Easy to remove paid edits but advertisement flag should stay until it's cleaned up more. Got a response: I put together edits in another sandbox & replied on talk page. (sandbox link: User:WyldEys/Sofinnova edits) 5 - Waiting for response to review and implement my changes.
The H Collective Talk:The H Collective Oct. 2021 This one didn't have any explanation, and appeared to be a false accusation. Posted on the talk page to ask the user for clarification. Received response from another editor and it was removed. *Flag was removed
Vionic Talk:Vionic Oct. 2021 I posted on the talk page with suggested changes, but might be worth deleting. Got response from another editor. Page was deleted 10
Status Key
Label Description
1 Nothing was posted on talk page, no action taken yet
2 Some information was posted on the talk page, no action taken yet
3 I'm waiting on response from another editor
4 Suggested changes need to be drafted up
5 Edits are ready to be implemented, waiting on review
* Flag has been removed.
9 Page or talk page is actively receiving edits, letting others take care of it
10 Page was deleted

My sandbox pages: