Jump to content

User talk:FrigidNinja: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by Chapy1987 (talk) to last revision by MiszaBot III (HG)
No edit summary
Line 58: Line 58:


:My mistake, sorry; to me, it appeared that you had randomly inserted characters, but I can see now that that was not the case. I have restored the page to your reversion, and have removed the warning from your talk page. '''''[[User:FrigidNinja|<span style="background-color:#1BE3E0;color:white;">Frigid</span>]][[User Talk:FrigidNinja|<span style="background-color:#510C59;color:white;">Ninja</span>]]''''' 14:42, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
:My mistake, sorry; to me, it appeared that you had randomly inserted characters, but I can see now that that was not the case. I have restored the page to your reversion, and have removed the warning from your talk page. '''''[[User:FrigidNinja|<span style="background-color:#1BE3E0;color:white;">Frigid</span>]][[User Talk:FrigidNinja|<span style="background-color:#510C59;color:white;">Ninja</span>]]''''' 14:42, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Yo man those where much noteworthy to be kept up there i dont lkke how you took down my facts aboujt clonzapam, so rude man, I work in an impatiant detox and im describeing the facts about what peoiple go through with this shit ,

Revision as of 18:04, 2 March 2013

Me Talk Contributions Awards Food and Drink Sandbox
vn-8This user talk page has been vandalized 8 times.

On the contrary

My edits to lowell greens page were most helpful, as nothing in the post (aside from his bibliography) indicates that the man is a giant gas bag blowing hot air and outright lies about topics he knows nothing about in order to rile up his listeners, who are, in fact and for the most part, aging conservatives. This is wikipedia for christs sake, can we not be truthful, honest, or accurate? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.70.17.22 (talk) 16:55, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but stating that he "pontificates to an aging right-wing audience from his throne of ignorance" is a personal opinion and does not adhere to WP:NPOV and violates WP:BLP. The comment that you added was completely unsourced, and according to the BLP policy, is to be removed immediately without discussion. I realize that you may feel strongly about Lowell Green, but please refrain from adding comments such as these to Wikipedia, which is meant to be a neutral, reliably sourced encyclopedia. Thank you. FrigidNinja (talk) 17:06, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Arab Finance Corporation

Hello FrigidNinja. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Arab Finance Corporation, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 17:14, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

article Legambiente

Oh, you are right... I had just started translating the italian version of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cignoverdeoro (talkcontribs) 18:18, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for rollback

Hi FrigidNinja. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Malinaccier (talk) 00:35, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I should have given you reviewer the first time. I've given you the reviewer permission now. Take a look at Wikipedia:Reviewer to learn about the reviewer user right. Malinaccier (talk) 04:32, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to STiki!

Hello, FrigidNinja, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Here are some pages which are a little more fun:

  • The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users!
  • Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes!

We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (talk) 06:26, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

let's see,

you undid my revision because it didn't appear to be constructive. did you actually see what was changed or you decided today to randomly undo revisions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.66.116.225 (talk) 14:30, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake, sorry; to me, it appeared that you had randomly inserted characters, but I can see now that that was not the case. I have restored the page to your reversion, and have removed the warning from your talk page. FrigidNinja 14:42, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yo man those where much noteworthy to be kept up there i dont lkke how you took down my facts aboujt clonzapam, so rude man, I work in an impatiant detox and im describeing the facts about what peoiple go through with this shit ,