Jump to content

User talk:Sitush: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
NeilN (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 77: Line 77:


==I love you sitush==
==I love you sitush==

==Sitush did you know Delhi==
Calcutta (now Kolkata ) was the capital of India
during the British Raj until December 1911.
However, Delhi had served as the political and
financial centre of several empires of ancient India
and the Delhi Sultanate , most notably of the
Mughal Empire from 1649 to 1857. During the
early 1900s, a proposal was made to the British
administration to shift the capital of the British
Indian Empire (as it was officially called) from
Calcutta to Delhi. Unlike Calcutta, which was
located on the eastern coast of India, Delhi was
located in northern India and the Government of
British India felt that it would be easier to
administer India from Delhi rather than from
Calcutta.

Revision as of 03:54, 26 March 2015


... or panic madly and freak out?
Have you come here to rant at me? It is water off a duck's back.

New Articles

Hi Sitush. Would you mind taking a look at List of Prime Ministerial trips made by Narendra Modi and Sushma Swaraj's tenure as External Affairs Minister which most likely do not qualify to be stand alone articles.  LeoFrank  Talk 14:47, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Utter trivia, but then most lists are. - Sitush (talk) 17:43, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request for edits in vellala wiki page

Hi I need to add this content on vellala wiki page.

page 110 and 111 , Ancient to Medieval South Indian Society in Transition ,Noboru Karashima. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/ancient-to-medieval-south-indian-society-in-transition-9780198063124?cc=us&lang=en&

he says "The Second Point I wish to add here for future discussion concerns the caste system based on hierarchy .These Thirty or Fourty years Scholars have been discussing the issue of caste hierarchy,Concentrating their arguments on the question of which of the two,Brahmanas or the King(Kshatriya),occupied the pinnacle of the hierarchy , or which of the two, religion or politics ,played crucial role in maintaining social order in traditional India,by quoting A.M . Hocart and/or Louis Dumont , it seems to be more important ,however , To realize the independence of the two, Brahmana and King, or Religious and the Political , if we consider empirically the function of the so-called caste hierarchy.In the Long course of Indian History , the opposition between the allies of Brahmana and King(Kshtriyas or dominant caste) as rulers on the one hand,and the others groups(classified theoretically as Vaishya or sudra ) as the ruled on the other,has had much significance in society ,Though no communities properly called Kshatriyas have existed in south India, we are able to regard the Vellalas , Who were the dominant caste , as having played the role of Kshatriya in ancient and medieval Tamil Country, A good example of Brahmana/Vellala coordination can be seen in the Thirukkachchur incription, quoted above , contrasting the (good) behaviour of Brahmana and Vellala with the (lowly) behaviour of the lower jatis and missing the former . The best example of the conforntation between the Brahmanas/Vellalas allies and other communities organized as idankai and valankai may be found in the revolt inscriptions of the fifteenth century referred to above"

Request to wiki editor to add this info into wiki page of vellala — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.222.186.175 (talk) 15:44, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Observer access?

Sitush, do you have access to The Observer archives dating back to 1989, and in particular this article? Context. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 21:58, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your talk page proved to be of value even in your absense, since User:NQ emailed me the article. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 22:46, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

When you have some time?

Sitush, you were such a big help when I did my Blitzkid page. To be honest, if I knew then what I do now, I would've taken a path of less resistance to publishing in the first place! But because I met with those obstacles, and certainly in good part due to your support and knowledge, it got done and is a much better article for it.

I am trying to redeem an article by a similar band called The Cryptkeeper Five. It was a little stub that has been up for years (not mine originally) but has been nominated for deletion a few days ago. I am trying to help it b/c I believe the subject is notable (and naturally, I am a fan of them). So, since I jumped aboard I have messed it up in terms of NPOV, and have inserted some clumsy sections. But I hae a singular mission: to establish notability. I can improve its style and tone over time, but I have a week to establish notability if I've understood correctly.

So, if you have any pointers... I am aware of it's flaws (I have used some references that might be even dodgier than the previous article), but any advice is appreciated. :) Keithramone33 (talk) 23:12, 23 March 2015 (UTC)Keithramone33[reply]

I am not around here much at the moment and, as you know, I'm wary of sources for popular culture. I have just glanced at the article and there are a lot of blogs etc in there. I would suggest not adding any further blog type sources and instead concentrate on finding "hard" sources - maybe try newspapers.com or something like that for concert/record reviews?
I doubt that the article will be deleted because there are a few half-decent sources in there. But it does need work and that will likely take more than a week. If it is deleted then you could ask for the deleted version to be userfied so that you can try to improve it. Userfication means that the thing would be put into a subpage of your own userspace - it would not form a part of the public encyclopaedia but could be moved back into mainspace when you have resolved whatever the problems were that caused the deletion.
As previously, you need to tread carefully because of your fan status. - Sitush (talk) 07:44, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Sitush. I did find a small handful of newspapers and such, and have included them. I guess my thoughts on the weaker sources was that I am not using them to assert controversial details, or to form the basis of my notability argument, but rather, you know, to flesh out the article :)
I agree that it needs work! Thank you or your continued help.Keithramone33 (talk) 17:19, 24 March 2015 (UTC)Keithramone33[reply]

Listen Sitush

Hi sitush please donot edit reddy — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrSachinReddyapolo (talkcontribs) 05:52, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A Request by helpless brahmin

Dear sitush sir please defend the truth i am a kaashyap gotra kanyakubj brahmin.its all true about bhooinhar brahmins.please sir use sense ,please defend the truth.yow are powerfull at wikipedia you can edit anyway.but you are playing with truth.i cannot do anything but for god please defend the truth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rahultewaritewari (talkcontribs) 11:00, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

sitush sir

i have no references about it but i am kanyakubj brahmin.it is all true that ancestors of kaashyap gotra kanyakubj brahmins are Zamindar bhuinhar brahmins. we are also bhuinhar brahmins. not all kanyakubj brahmins but only kaashyap gotta kanyakubjs are bhuinhar brahmins — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rahultewaritewari (talkcontribs) 06:08, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:V. I am afraid that we cannot accept statements that lack sources, except in the most elementary circumstances. And nothing related to caste communities is elementary other than that they are human beings. - Sitush (talk) 06:10, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

sir i am kaashayap gotra tri (three) pravar kanyakubj brahmin , Madhya nadi kuldev Vishnu ,,mul madarpur zamindar bhuinhar brahmin aspad tiwari

Jolly good for you. It makes no difference here, though. - Sitush (talk) 06:53, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

you are so cute

you are so cute and lovely — Preceding unsigned comment added by Controllergenralofdelhi (talkcontribs) 03:31, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I can't wait to see how you respond to this. --NeilN talk to me 03:35, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I love you sitush

Sitush did you know Delhi

Calcutta (now Kolkata ) was the capital of India during the British Raj until December 1911. However, Delhi had served as the political and financial centre of several empires of ancient India and the Delhi Sultanate , most notably of the Mughal Empire from 1649 to 1857. During the early 1900s, a proposal was made to the British administration to shift the capital of the British Indian Empire (as it was officially called) from Calcutta to Delhi. Unlike Calcutta, which was located on the eastern coast of India, Delhi was located in northern India and the Government of British India felt that it would be easier to administer India from Delhi rather than from Calcutta.