Jump to content

User talk:برسام

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, برسام, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Meno25 (talk) 23:08, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pack it in

[edit]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --Folantin (talk) 12:48, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Hamadan

[edit]

A complaint about your edits has been filed at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:برسام reported by User:Samak. You may respond there if you wish. Edit warring is serious; you may be blocked. You should promise to wait for consensus before trying to change the spelling of Hamadan again. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 22:33, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You've been warned per the result of Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:برسام reported by User:Samak (Result: Warned). If you continue to change the spelling of Hamadan without getting a talk page consensus you may be blocked. EdJohnston (talk) 04:59, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

4 words don't make a list. Even if you reference all of them, I believe that an academic source about the subject would be needed.Xx236 (talk) 06:26, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am completing it! برسام (talk) 06:26, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.ejournals.eu/pliki/art/142/ Xx236 (talk) 06:41, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

FC Bunyodkor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Persian
Galatasaray S.K. (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Persian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm ToBeFree. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Dilraba Dilmurat, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:04, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. El_C 16:51, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deneb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:12, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Gorani language; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Newslinger talk 06:39, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Semsurî (talk) 10:56, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]