User talk:暖城2016-02-05

暖城2016-02-05, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi 暖城2016-02-05! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Dathus (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

August 2016[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and have been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Max Semenik (talk) 06:30, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@MaxSem: In which sense do you mean unconstructive? Since Tibet was ruled by Qing Dynasty and Tibet was a province of Qing, there is no reason not adding the country name. --暖城2016-02-05 (talk) 10:31, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017[edit]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. O1lI0 (talk) 11:48, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 暖城2016-02-05, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. O1lI0 (talk) 11:49, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@O1lI0: Hello, by no means have i used multiple accounts. I am living in a dorm where many users share the same IP address. I hope now you know and understand my circumstances.--暖城2016-02-05 (talk) 19:00, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you want to tell me that you share IP with people? Especially those who just register the account to make the same edit with you.It makes me doubt that you or someone else cooperates with different IP and account numbers to complete the same edit.

@Elnon: See WP:MEAT.

@TV Guy: See WP:SLEEPER.

You both have the possibility of using socks puppets. Differences among you who edit will make people feel more disgusted.--O1lI0 (talk) 16:40, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

O1lI0, you seem to be a sockpuppet of TV Guy. 暖城2016-02-05, you can just ignore this O1lI0. Eipviongll (talk) 06:56, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Eipviongll: You are right. I do not see any point in discussing with him any more. --暖城2016-02-05 (talk) 10:02, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@O1lI0: "Why do you want to tell me that you share IP with people?" BECAUSE I LIVE IN A STUENT DORM, ok? I wrote to you in a very polite manner, but you did response very rudely. I think I have already mentioned that before, haven't I? Anyway I am innocent, so I am afraid of nothing. I am also very curious why aren't you concentrated on the facts (Taktser is always a part of Ambo, Qinghai) but on something that does not exist at all? If you have evidence, show us all, otherwise please shut up, ok? Keep in mind that NEVER suspect anything without proofs. What you did brings nothing except makes people extremely disgusted. --暖城2016-02-05 (talk) 19:00, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Watch your past, we can find you just change the place for a manufacturing dispute. The focus of the discussion is not how many people are involved, but to follow the rules. On the same day, just edit the number of account editing content consistent with you.This is a very serious problem.If I do not doubt you, then it is absurd to believe that someone will register multiple accounts for your "editorial dispute".

Finally reminded that there is no reference source of the translation may be fake. Please add source or stop trouble.--O1lI0 (talk) 22:44, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. O1lI0 (talk) 22:44, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigations/O1lI0[edit]

暖城2016-02-05, just for you information, a sockpuppet investigation has been opened against O1lI0 and TV Guy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/O1lI0

Eipviongll (talk) 07:30, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Eipviongll I see it. thanks a lot for the info. --暖城2016-02-05 (talk) 10:00, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]