Jump to content

User talk:1З.26.12.18

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 2020[edit]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because the chosen username is a clear violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. GeneralNotability (talk) 17:06, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

1З.26.12.18 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

Requested new username 1З.26.12.18 (talk) 17:09, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You forgot to address your obviously inappropriate username. And frankly, I'm not sure your replacement username is significantly better. Yamla (talk) 17:19, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

1З.26.12.18 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

Look I made a mistake I will make good faith contributions such as removing spam but please don't scrutinize my username thank you. 1З.26.12.18 (talk) 17:20, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You'll get one more chance to propose an acceptable username before losing access to this page too. 331dot (talk) 20:35, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

1З.26.12.18 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

Per reason above, new user 1З.26.12.18 (talk) 20:52, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You haven't explained why you chose such a trollish username in the first place. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:59, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You say, "please don't scrutinize my username". However, we are required to scrutinize your username as that was the reason for your block. Which means you are required to account for your choice of username. --Yamla (talk) 10:38, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, so it really appears that the intent behind that username was either to deceive, or to troll. SQLQuery me! 03:22, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]