User talk:130.15.122.136

December 2019

Interesting that 130.15.122.136 is at Queen's University. I wonder if it happens to be Professor Ian McKay or one of his acolytes? If so, your edits, CLCStudent, are utterly incompetent from an academic standpoint. You have your facts wrong. This is all very very amusing and very interesting. McKay describes himself as "one of Canada's most prolific and well-respected historians." Very amusing indeed if he or a friend happens to be 130.15.122.136. lol.

Response: We've never heard of this McKay but a quick search of this very site reveals the reason: he's a prof at Mac, not at Queen's. Quite the conspiracy theorist, aren't you dude?

Response-Response: taught at Queen's from 1988-2015. https://peoplepill.com/people/ian-mckay-3/ Anyway evidently there are plenty of ignorant arseholes at Queen's too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Huntingleaf (talk • contribs) 19:20, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CLCStudent you have the shoe on the wrong foot. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. It is you who are acting as a vandal by repeatedly erasing quality content and accurate details from The Dorchester Review. You have your facts wrong. And your vandalism undermines the reputation of help desk. What is your motivation for removing the List of Contributors, which is entirely accurate? What is your motive for repeatedly inserting "non-peer-reviewed" when the book was reviewed by 4 Ph.Ds? Clearly you have not read the book and are not familiar with the material. Therefore you are incompetent to edit the page.

CLCStudentPlease stop your disruptive editing — Preceding unsigned comment added by Huntingleaf (talk • contribs) 21:24, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Dorchester Review have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 13:26, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This constitutes an edit war and not vandalism. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 18:26, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Dorchester Review, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 21:00, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is an edit war, not disruptive editing, and as such banning would be in contravention of Wikipedia's policy.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Dorchester Review. CLCStudent (talk) 21:02, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is an edit war, not disruptive editing, and as such banning would be in contravention of Wikipedia's policy.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:33, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

May 2020

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at The Dorchester Review, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Romartus Imperator (talk) 20:35, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.