User talk:173.167.210.137

Welcome!

Do not change the classification of Telaga caste. They are classified as Forward Caste as per Andhra Pradesh government gazette records. Do not change until you can show evidence that they are backward KAUTILYA3 - This user is trying to project Telaga caste as backward community today and trying to classify them as backward under British rule. Telaga caste are indeed forward from day of independence from British.

December 2016

Hello, I'm ThePlatypusofDoom. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Telaga without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 00:57, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Telaga. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges.

You adding unsourced content, deleting sourced content, and edit-warring. This is no good. It is not enough to post something random on the talk page. You need make valid points and convince all the involved editors. Kautilya3 (talk) 01:07, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

ARBIPA sanctions alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Kautilya3 (talk) 01:08, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Telaga

Hello, you have made 4 edits to the Telaga article, every one of which has been reverted. It is clear that you are unable to contribute in accordance with Wikipedia policies. Why don't you limit yourself to the talk page? If you make any valid points, some experienced user will use them to edit in a reliable way. If you persist in this, I am afraid you will get blocked. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 01:20, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Precisely as User:Kautilya3 said, you probably lack enough competence in either the English language or the Wikipedia policies.I would request you to limit your activities to the talk page where invigilation is much less strict and other editors could extract any substantial facts out of your posts and utilize them in developing articles here.Cheers!Aru@baska^{❯❯❯ Vanguard} 11:11, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for disruptive editing. Wikipedia articles use reliable sources, and editing to puff up your own caste isn't welcome. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | talk 12:13, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

---