User talk:173.72.97.141

April 2019

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 23:23, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

173.72.97.141 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have been unfairly blocked because I'm pointing out to whether something is incorrect like any reference would not match with the subject and attempting to replace with the correct reference.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Huon (talk) 00:00, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

173.72.97.141 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I've been blocked because I'm trying to correctly edit the page that contains the discography of Billie Ellish. The reason for the edit is that the original article that refers to the chart status of "Bad Guy" (https://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/chart-beat/8506136/billie-eilish-debut-week-charts-five-burning-questions) did not mention the exact chart status. At the time I did the edit, Gary Trust of Billboard's Chart Beat have not released the article that featured the current Hot 100 top 10. The recent article is just released about a few minutes ago and whoever placed the chart status in the first place should've waited till Gary Trust released his article. My edits are necessary and they are not meant to cause damage to any pages of Wikipedia because I have a good catch of pointing out to whether anything is incorrect such as misspelling or unmatched information.

Decline reason:

Again, this is not remotely relevant. You are blocked because you are believed to be PeopleEater143. Nothing else is relevant. Address this, and only this, in your next unblock request. See WP:GAB which explains how to craft a reasonable unblock request. Yamla (talk) 00:26, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

---