User talk:187.39.132.210

can you correct the gramatic at this page?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_Brazil#First_Brazilian_Republic, trinidad conflict part, UK, portugal and trinidad are written in portuguese, so can someone please fix it as im blocked and cant edit?

unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

187.39.132.210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please, unblock me, i am sorry for what the last owner of this IP did, and i wont do the same, please, give me a chance to contribute as i saw much pages that really need to edit, like: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_Brazil#First_Brazilian_Republic, so please, the ban isn't needed to prevent disruption to wikipedia, and i know the rules and i will follow them, i swear, please, unblock me, sorry for the misunderstanding and all the problems it caused. 187.39.132.210 (talk) 14:41, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No, sorry, a particularly troublesome user is operating from your IP address. However, you are free to register an account via WP:ACC. This would allow us to ensure you aren't that troublesome user. Yamla (talk) 14:46, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

187.39.132.210 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

ok, so literally, if you want to block me, get an reason (or an page where i vandalized), and not only banning me because my username is like another guy's username, and bruh, take a look at this:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/187.39.132.210, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Arandomitalo-japaneseamerican, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/PastaEditor2, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/PastaEditor, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2804:14D:4488:1CFF:C17C:B2B4:C572:5CEC/64, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2804:14D:4486:513:C433:A1C8:8D8E:E3C3/64, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/177.83.137.145, or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Marquinhosdaswiki (TheTimesARENTchanginglol is not my account, it was made by the last owner), there is a single page i vandalized? no, only good contributions and reverting vandalism by sockpuppets and IP users, there is LITERALLY no vandalism or sockpuppetry i have commited, General Notability (the guy that blocked me) said: " Yup, looks like the IP is the same person as before, and Marquinhosdaswiki looks similar to past socks. Blocked and tagged named account, IP blocked for three months since it's clearly not changing much.", not changing much is not an exact reason to ban someone, "IP same person", what person are you referring? me or the old owner of the ip/house? "he looks similar to past socks" how?, also, three months is much time for having literally more than 1 account without doing any vandalism, like, really, i wont do vandalism or sockpuppetry, i just want to contribute normally without admins banning me all 1-2 weeks, dont you guys see that im just trying to contribute? and IF i did any error, *CORRECT* me instead, dont come and give instant ban, banning isnt needed to prevent me from sockpuppetry or vandalism, BECAUSE I DIDNT VANDALIZE OR DID SOCKPUPPETRY,im sorry for the actions of the last owner and the time it took for you guys to do all this investigation, i promise i wont be like him and that i wont be an vandal, i appreciate your guy's job, but, sadly, the last guy probably just got another house and is probably vandalizing again (about him and the other vandal, i think that they are closely related, being the same person or friends/brothers,etc), i WILL respect the rules and wont vandalize, i know all the rules, i will be more productive and useful, i understand the reason for the block and i wont repeat what the last guy did (its not my fault that the last guy using my IP range is an vandal and sockpuppeter, im totally not involved in any act of vandalism or sockpuppetry commited by him), i will do useful contributions and if possibly help to catch sock puppeters. 187.39.132.210 (talk) 21:33, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked to prevent further time-wasting like "the person who was using this IP yesterday probably bought a new house". This is absurd trolling. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:23, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

also, if you want, you can make marquinhoswikipediano continue being a suspected sockpuppet and let me do another account with an different username so there will be no more accidents. 187.39.132.210 (talk) 21:35, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.