User talk:1Mamalujo

This is 1Mamalujo's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Columbia 30 (February 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Columbia 30 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 19:13, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 1Mamalujo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 19:13, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages such as Talk:Revolution of Dignity are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. Rsk6400 (talk) 07:46, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Russell Brand, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.
Please see WP:LIFESITENEWS - Arjayay (talk) 14:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Russell Brand, you may be blocked from editing.
You have already been warned not to cite Lifesitenews as per WP:LIFESITENEWS - Arjayay (talk) 16:15, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The material is factual. You can find it in his own product and in his own words. 1Mamalujo (talk) 04:23, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]