User talk:2001:871:237:2B:74AA:AA9B:7865:E84E

November 2021

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 19:22, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2001:871:237:2B:74AA:AA9B:7865:E84E (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

To quote what you wrote: Everyone, please recall that WP:BLP (and WP:BDP) applies to talk pages and noticeboards as well as the articlespace. While it is reasonable to have a discussion about whether this content ought to be included, describing details of alleged crimes without any reliable sources is not. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 19:30, 20 November 2021 (UTC) I did include a source, maybe it wasn't seen? It was referenced at the very start of he section. 2001:871:237:2B:74AA:AA9B:7865:E84E (talk) 19:36, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As per below, WP:RS is relevant. Note that WP:BLP doesn't just apply to currently living people, it also applies to the recently deceased. Yamla (talk) 19:48, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You seem to have missed the word "reliable" in my comment. Fringe sources such as "wisconsinrightnow.com" do not qualify. The BLP policy has been linked to you repeatedly, and you seem persistent in ignoring it. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 19:39, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then why not tell me that this source doesn't qualify? It's not like there wouldn't be dozens of sources that reported about it. And hwy block for BLP if RS is your issue? I honestly don't understand you. You know, i am not paid by a SuperPac to edit wikipedia in their favor like you, so i wouldn't know.2001:871:237:2B:74AA:AA9B:7865:E84E (talk) 19:54, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:RS, which has already been linked. This "news outfit" has no apparent editorial board, and the shoddily put-together website (note the "Contact us: contact@yoursite.com" at the bottom) is typical of content farms.

Casting unfounded aspersions, such as that I am "paid by a SuperPac", is not likely to help your cause, by the way. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 20:03, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't address any of my points. Is it business as usual to ban for RS. For something that i can give you 10 other sources for if you just ask for it, which you did not do? And then why block for BLP? Don't forget to assume good faith, dear SuperPAC employee 2001:871:237:2B:74AA:AA9B:7865:E84E (talk) 20:14, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The BLP policy is quite clear that any contentious claims about living or recently deceased people must be supported by reliable sources. I blocked because of your repeated failure to do this, after the BLP policy was explained to you. Feel free to sit out the block or request unblock from another admin, the choice is up to you, but my discussion here is done. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 20:21, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As a note to any admin who may decide to consider an unblock request, please note the apparent block evasion: Special:Contribs/213.142.96.135. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 20:26, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you're able to find 10 high quality clearly reliable secondary sources then please do so. I don't know why you're adding absolute junk like the source discussed above, followed by a clear WP:BLPPRIMARY violation on this talk page after you were blocked when there are supposedly so many quality sources. If you still haven't read the whole BLP policy then please do so since you clearly need to familiarise yourself with it. Nil Einne (talk) 10:08, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There were sources linked here on the talkpage and removed. One was a direct link to the criminal records on a government page. There are multiple other sources, which includes also CNN and even snopes, in the BLP discussion about it. All reliable sources have been presented. And you yourself could have found them if you would have bothered with investing even the lowest amount of effort. It would have taken you less time than it too you to write this comment. Remember to Assume good Faith 2001:871:237:58FB:35D8:81C4:D7CE:D601 (talk) 20:54, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.