User talk:201.182.80.18

July 2023

Hello, I'm Schminnte. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Knights of the Zodiac (film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 00:40, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Knights of the Zodiac (film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 00:50, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Can you please read what I posted on the talk section so we can end with this? I have solid evidence that the movie didn't cost 60 millions dollars. Plase read it.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Knights of the Zodiac (film). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 03:35, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Knights of the Zodiac (film). We do not put down "unknown" if a film's budget is unknown. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 22:59, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Third opinion

Hi IP201, and thanks for seeking out a third opinion. Since there has not been thorough discussion, I declined the request. It may take time for other interested editors to read and respond to your comment. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 01:58, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

There is no discussion because the other guy didn't read the evidence I've quoted... What am I gsupposed to do?

If you guys just take 1 minute to check the links I've provided you will see I'm right. 201.182.80.18 (talk) 06:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

---