User talk:21.Andromedae/Archive 3

Please don't add ban notices to user pages

...especially incorrectly, as you did here. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:36, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok. Thanks. InTheAstronomy32 (talk) 13:40, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi InTheAstronomy32. Thank you for your work on Gliese 65 b. Another editor, Voorts, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please remember to tag redirects that you create per WP:REDCAT.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Voorts}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

voorts (talk/contributions) 23:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of largest galaxies

Hello, I'm SkyFlubbler. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of largest galaxies have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. SkyFlubbler (talk) 05:37, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, now i added all parameters for the galaxy. InTheAstronomy32 (talk) 11:50, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi InTheAstronomy32. Thank you for your work on HD 63332. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:31, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! InTheAstronomy32 (talk) 10:40, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On changing text without changing citations

Greetings, I've seen that you have rearranged some text here without moving around citations to match. Please don't do this, it leaves the text unsourced - "Precise distances from OGLE-IV member RR Lyrae stars in six bulge globular clusters" for example does not mention M62H now. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 06:36, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it is a reference for the distance to Messier 62 and hence M62H. InTheAstronomy32 (talk) 11:13, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I've changed the citation format a bit so that it matches that of the article. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 06:27, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List-defined references

Hi, InTheAstronomy32. I just wanted to point out that a lot of our articles on stars use list-defined references. Your recent edits to update the astrometry etc have left a lot of these articles with citation errors, because the references are still defined, but not used in the article. You can see the error messages in the reference section of Alpha Indi, for example, and you can fix them by removing the definitions for any references that are not still in use. Could you go over the articles that you've edited recently and tidy the unused references up? You can find a list of the articles with this kind of error Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting. Many thanks, and thanks for your work on the articles, Wham2001 (talk) 07:47, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]