User talk:2600:8807:C845:4500:61E:64FF:FEF5:3A94

October 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Richard Wilbur has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Richard Wilbur was changed by 2600:8807:C845:4500:61E:64FF:FEF5:3A94 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.897124 on 2017-10-22T03:42:12+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:42, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

April 2018

Hello, I'm Thewinrat. I noticed that you recently removed content from Judd Apatow without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Thewinrat (talk) 19:16, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Judd Apatow, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 21:11, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Judd Apatow. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 21:12, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Judd Apatow. 331dot (talk) 21:23, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Judd Apatow, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. We do welcome discussion on the talk page, if you have issues with sources, etc. — Javert2113 (talk) 21:24, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---