User talk:2605:8D80:643:600F:2FB4:C4D4:94FE:29D9

April 2020

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:55, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2605:8D80:643:600F:2FB4:C4D4:94FE:29D9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What 'disruptive edits'? When? What editing protocol has been violated?

Decline reason:

Edits like this. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 06:38, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

And as you are clearly the person under discussion in the sock report, you regularly disrupt those sock reports, and this is a likely static IP address, I have increased the block length to one month. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 06:42, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2605:8D80:643:600F:2FB4:C4D4:94FE:29D9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How is that edit a violation of policy? And no, I am not that person, nor have I ever regularly disrupted any sock reports. Where's your evidence?

Decline reason:

Ah ha. Right. WP:GAB explains how to craft an acceptable unblock request with a possibility of being accepted. This isn't. Yamla (talk) 12:11, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.