User talk:3TimesALoser

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Failure (disambiguation), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Logical Cowboy (talk) 01:10, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Loser (hand gesture). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Logical Cowboy (talk) 01:12, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Loser (Beck song). It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Logical Cowboy (talk) 01:16, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Loser (3 Doors Down song), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Logical Cowboy (talk) 01:17, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What did I vandalize in the 3 Doors Down article retard?

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing for Vandalism. If you feel this block is unjustified, you may contest it by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Diannaa ^(Talk) 01:19, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

3TimesALoser (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the absolute only thing worth a warning was the cliff lee joke, the rest are not. thank you

Decline reason:

Maybe, but calling someone a "retard" more than once over it doesn't make me eager to start the unblock process anytime soon. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:29, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.