User talk:4356

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Mount assisi school article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

Feel free to re-submit a new version of the article. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I irrevocably release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, for use on Wikipedia and elsewhere."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page. --ArmadilloFromHell 04:59, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Implementing a new system call... article

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Implementing a new system call on linux 2.6, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Implementing a new system call on linux 2.6. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.

As the "What Wikipedia is not" link suggests, an instruction manual or how-to article isn't appropriate content. You might wish to transwiki this article to a sister wiki where such content is appropriate. If you've got any questions, please let me know, and I'll be happy to help. Shimeru 07:05, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read the above? There is no point in re-creating the article here. Do it at Wikibooks. -- RHaworth 19:45, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've replied to your message on my talk page. Shimeru 20:51, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Vishnu, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Abecedare (talk) 18:54, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Vishnu. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Cutno (talk) 19:08, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, 4356. You have new messages at Abecedare's talk page.
Message added 19:44, 6 March 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Abecedare (talk) 19:44, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:04, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Vishnu. Cutno (talk) 20:48, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for Disruptive editing. Despite being counseled by two editors on Wikipedia's policies you have removed sourced content and inserted your personal opinions into articles as fact. Please read the relevant policies that you've been alerted to and contribute effectively once your block expires.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. —SpacemanSpiff 22:38, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]