Jump to content

User talk:49.150.110.214

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aizu Bus (August 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:10, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, 49.150.110.214! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:10, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for block evasion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  DrKay (talk) 05:32, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

49.150.110.214 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I need to unblock temporary this IP address, so I would discuss at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. 49.150.110.214 (talk) 03:05, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

If you want to appeal your block you can post the appeal here and I will place it at ANI for you. Given your disruption on that very page in the past I do not think unblocking you to post there directly is a good idea. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 03:09, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What do you need to discuss at ANI? This IP address has been blocked for abuse and repeated block evasion by an originating user - Frontman830. Are you this person? If so, if you can log into your account, I can try and help you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:07, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Wait, what about DrKay? does they have evidence with this?
--49.150.110.214 (talk) 03:08, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

49.150.110.214 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I need to appeal this block by following these evidence of DrKay's allegations:

But I have to try this time, for second chance. 49.150.110.214 (talk) 03:13, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request. 331dot (talk) 08:39, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is not an appeal and I will not be posting it to ANI. It is a series of comments on another editor. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 03:14, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, I have this evidence involving DrKay dealing with Peter Ormond for disruptive, harassment and personal attacks as a violation of terms of use. --49.150.110.214 (talk) 03:17, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked repeatedly from this website. You are not welcome and you are not part of the community. Per Wikipedia:THREESTRIKES you are banned from the community. I suggest you take your concerns about the foundation to the foundation. You may not use this talk page to continue to attack users. I am revoking your talk page access. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 03:27, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

[edit]
Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 03:28, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]