Jump to content

User talk:64.106.111.74

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Flyer22 Frozen. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Complete androgen insensitivity syndrome—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 03:05, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Regarding your changes to Complete androgen insensitivity syndrome, and your comments at Flyer22 Frozen's Talk page, please understand that Wikipedia content must be verifiable, and have citations to reliable sources to back it up. If you are a content expert as you claim to be, that's great, it may help you organize what you wish to write, and make a more coherent story than people approaching the topic from a non-expert background, but you may not simply insert whatever you like into the article based on your claim of being a domain expert, and it does not absolve you of the requirements of WP:Verifiability. If your content is correct, then you will have no problem finding reliable sources to back it up, which, by the way, must be independent, secondary, reliable sources. From those, please create citations (see Help:Footnotes for more on Wikipedia's approach to this), and then reinsert your content into the article, accompanied by the citations, and then it should be fine. This is an encyclopedia, so primary sources should be avoided. In addition, because this is an article about a medical type, there is a more strict requirement for what consitutes a "reliable source" for the purpose of this article: please read WP:MEDRS.

In addition, your 5kb edit involved many changes all over the article. This makes it harder to evaluate, and accept or reject piecewise, not to mention almost impossible to describe in the edit summary. My recommendation would be to split your edit into about ten to twenty separate edits, each one concentrating on just one, contiguous piece of text, and which can be as small as one word, if it is an important point that requires some explanation. For each edit, please use the edit summary field to explain why the edit constitutes and improvement to the article. This will make it less likely that your edit(s) will be reverted; and if some of them are for good cause, it won't be as burdensome to fix whatever the problem was, and reinsert it. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 10:17, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a minimum number of days and made a minimum number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (64.106.111.74) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! Mathglot (talk) 10:05, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]