User talk:65.184.185.156

November 2021

Do not use multiple IP addresses to disrupt Wikipedia. Such attempts to avoid detection, circumvent policies or evade blocks or sanctions will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 21:18, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:47, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

65.184.185.156 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I didn't vandalize, I just merged sections in tables. 65.184.185.156 (talk) 02:03, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Funny how you live in multiple cities. Must be expensive to have a house in South Carolina, New York City, and Boston. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:22, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Okay, I lied. I just didn't want people to revert my edits, so I tried what Shawn Wu did: he works at Nick so you can't revert his edits, so I tried that. 65.184.185.156 (talk) 03:26, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

Hello, I'm Rebel Agent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sharkdog have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Rebel^{Agent talk to me} 18:21, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

How was that not constructive?! Literally the Netflix webiste lists it. Here it is.

They didn't appear to be constructive because you didn't provide references to reliable sources on your contributions as I said before, Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources! See Wikipedia:Reliable Sources read the policy and understand it, again when someone revert your edits don't just add them back if you didn't understand why or your feel they made a mistake ask them at their talk first. Thanks Rebel^{Agent talk to me} 18:49, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The More You Know (TV programming block). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 18:28, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Yeah, sorry. I was technically right, as TMYK was not exactly the fourth block, technically the fifth, as Go Time premiered in syndication just a week before TMYK launched in the fall of 2016. 65.184.185.156 (talk) 18:34, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 18:55, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:23, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

---