User talk:78.159.147.70

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Create new pages and rename pages
Edit semi-protected pages
Upload images
Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without an account, your IP address (78.159.147.70) is used to identify you instead.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 04:40, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Hello, I'm Optakeover. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Medieval Bulgarian army with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Optakeover ^(Talk) 16:24, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if I see this content was removed again by an admin, as speculative claim. 78.159.147.70 (talk) 17:15, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Souliotes. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--Zoupan 18:03, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Krum with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Winner 42 Talk to me! 19:23, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Malamir of Bulgaria. Winner 42 Talk to me! 19:23, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

article Utigurs vandalization

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 93.152.143.113 (talk) 18:46, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article Huns vandalization

Your unexplained edit on article "Huns" has been reported to the administrators. 93.152.143.113 (talk) 21:15, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Внимавай

Пич, вие си имате там Хасановци, Мехмедовци и разни други паши. Що не се занимаваш с тях ? 93.152.143.113 (talk) 00:17, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Hello, I'm Denisarona. Your recent edit to the page Huns appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 17:05, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Balkans, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Ricky81682 (talk) 09:35, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

I'm not sure what your editing is doing but it's very aggressive in an area that's been very problematic and with very little discussion on your part. Edits like this give little explanation for anyone else to figure out. Edits with the summary of "Per sources" doesn't explain the removal of sources (with little changes in text) and you're not helping your cause by eliminating entire sections like you did here under the claim that those who wrote it are "biased" or "POV." Wikipedia is not a battleground so knock off the attacking edit summaries and show some attempt to assume good faith from other editors. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 09:26, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Serbs in Bulgaria

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Serbs in Bulgaria. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--Zoupan 06:24, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zoupan. I didnt find any reliable Enlish source confirming your idea Saint Georgi was a Serb. Neither on Google books, nor on Google schoolar. I think your edit supports nationalist agenda and is unjustified. Please, refrain from making such unconstructive edits. Regards. 78.159.147.70 (talk) 17:00, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Serbian saint doesn't necessarily mean "ethnic Serb", which you are claiming. Please do not deliberately misinterpret terms as per your own agenda. The sentence refers to the Serbian community in Sofia (emphasis is made on the community and Peja), and should not be removed; I have altered "Serbian saint" to "Serbian and Bulgarian saint".--Zoupan 19:54, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sock

Hello, 78.159.147.70, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as 46.16.193.70 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections. Thank you.--Zoupan 15:05, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. Abecedare (talk) 04:13, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Abecedare (talk) 16:38, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Bulgarians

Hi! I will ask you to stop to delete sources and to change numbers of population in infobox of Bulgarians. And primary - PLEASE, USE TALK PAGE, before to make a changes. You are free to discuss and represent your point of view in talk page and when make a consensus by representing problem, the changes will be adding in the article. Your edits in this article seems deconstructive until this moment. I want to tell you some other things.

1. Wikipedia is not a place for nationalistic and political propaganda. Please, stop to change the number of Bulgarians in Bulgaria to 6 milion. Read the leading sentence of the article "Bulgarians are nation..." According to Bulgarian and European law (see Constitution of Republic of Bulgaria) and understanding of this concept (read Ivan Shishmanov) all citizens of Bulgaria are considered as Bulgarians. Outside Bulgaria are include people of Bulgarian nationality or ancestry. Look at what it is representing in French people and Greeks. The number of population of the country is adding there. Look at the French people collage - there are people like Zinedine Zidane or Josephine Baker, who are not a ethnic french, but they are part of the French nation and they are French people. Your sort of view to ignore the rest Bulgarians can be considered as xenophobic by the way.

2. Again, use the Talk page before to make a changes. Thnk you in advance!--Stolichanin (talk) 11:06, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I use only reliable sources, not tabloids. Stop using them. 78.159.147.70 (talk) 11:16, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Now please, use the talk page and stop to make a changes. Prove your theory there and we will add in the article! Your changes are categorized as vandalism by WP rules.--Stolichanin (talk) 11:26, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Goce Delcev

Goce Delcev called himself Bulgarian Only on Bulgarian side you can't say his Bulgarian only because you like Bulgarians The Current issue thats going(Macedonians and Bulgarians) This issue has to stay neutral and the only way would be To put it has Macedonian/Bulgarian or Bulgarian/Macedonian if you say His Macedonian then there would be Complaining from Bulgarians if it is Bulgarians then Macedonians Would be complaining so i strongly agree to keep it has Macedonian/Bulgarian or Bulgarian/Macedonian So please keep it like that its the best for the people who want to learn btw all so added 'Disputed' On it — Preceding unsigned comment added by MkCreeper (talk • contribs) 11:57, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please, respect reliable sources added to the article. Even Macedonian historians recognize this fact, but you simply did not read it. 78.159.147.70 (talk) 19:12, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.