Jump to content

User talk:80.111.42.187

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Stop![edit]

Please stop you mass, undiscussed, changes from British to Cornish. As I am sure you are well aware this is an area in which there has been a deal of dispute in the past. If you feel that these changes should be made then you should gain consensus first on the talk pages or through an RfC. DuncanHill (talk) 21:44, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Seán McLoughlin (communist) has been reverted.
Your edit here to Seán McLoughlin (communist) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://theirishrevolution.wordpress.com/2018/01/15/1916-cmdt-general-sean-mcloughlin-on-how-anti-treaty-forces-could-win-the-civil-war/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:31, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

January 2018[edit]

Your are edit warring on two articles related to the troubles. Please read WP:BRD, you were bold, you have been reverted you know discuss. If you persist in reverting without discussion you will be reported for edit warring and may be blocked. I suggest you self revert now on both articles and make the case for the change on the talk page -----Snowded TALK 22:29, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Pierce Brosnan[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Nicnotesay hello!contribs 18:32, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA and OR[edit]

Hello. Again. Please do not add original research to articles. Whether in respect of translations. Or anything else. Where, for example, placenames have an official or common-use Irish equivalent, then -sure- it might be appropriate to add it to the article about that Irish place/placename. However, for example, adding, "self created" translations to brand names or similar is completely inappropriate. Your addition to the Irish Independent article for example was inappropriate. Ignoring the fact that "Éireann Neamhspleách" is not grammatical Irish (not by a long stretch), it is not used anywhere outside of this project. If something (like an Irish "translation") only exists in Wikipedia, then it is -by definition- original research. And not compatible with project scope. If you are interested in promoting the Irish language, then consider taking some classes. And then perhaps contributing to the GA WP project. Defacing articles here (with nonsense and OR) is neither helpful to this project, nor to the promotion of the language. Guliolopez (talk) 19:14, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Apollo The Logician, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Scolaire (talk) 15:20, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]