User talk:81.164.150.171

ANI

Do not start a new discussion. There is already a report logged regarding you. Discuss there. Robvanvee 08:57, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

You are referencing virtual constructs that have no significance if said unfairly. They seem to have nationalistic motivation and are causing conflict. I have not received any of these website warning codes. I am not the person who is starting "wiki-wars". I am here to see that nobody is treated unfairly. There is also no point of claiming random writing on a page is a warning, it's merely your culture.

And I don't really care. Just stick to one report per incident at ANI. Thanks. Robvanvee 09:08, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Guy (help!) 11:05, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

81.164.150.171 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Handful of administrators have British nationalistic motivation and are causing conflict. I have not received any of these website warning codes they reference. I am not the person who is starting "wiki-wars". I am here to see that nobody is treated unfairly or exploited.

Decline reason:

Here, you acknowledged the warnings. Stop claiming you never received them, that's blatantly untrue. Yamla (talk) 12:53, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• You do realise we can see the history of this talk page, don't you? And we can see every time you remove anything, like removing this warning here. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:46, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

  @Boing! said Zebedee: I pointed this out to them when I first saw them doing it - doesn't seem to have had much of an impact. Naypta ☺ | ✉ talk page | 12:48, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Unblock requests

Do not edit other people's comments. You are free to make a new unblock request; WP:GAB will explain how. Note that you run the very real risk of having your current block substantially expanded if your unblock request does not completely address the significant concerns with your editing. --Yamla (talk) 14:57, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

---