User talk:8MA8

Welcome!

Hello, 8MA8, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Mico Apostolov, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Fæ (talk) 03:20, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mico Apostolov

A tag has been placed on Mico Apostolov requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Fæ (talk) 03:20, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Mico Apostolov. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:44, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Mico Apostolov

I have nominated Mico Apostolov, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mico Apostolov. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Fæ (talk) 12:56, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

dear Fæ, I would like to develop this article and please give me some more time in order to fully create the page. It is important that some of the economist form a small country of Macedonia are mapped, and as there are not many every ast one counts. Thus, please do not delete this page and let me branch it off in other languages, hence contribute to wikipedia. Since, this is my first article I am still trying to get around wikipedia terms and regulations. Thank you very much.

There are some easy options to choose from:

You could ask for the article to be 'userfied' in the deletion discussion, this will ensure that if the consensus is to delete, you will still have a draft version to continue working on in your userspace.
You could find an independent good quality reliable source to demonstrate that Mico Apostolov is notable under any of the criteria defined in WP:BIO or WP:PROF. If you can find a single source that can demonstrate notability (by these definitions) then the article will automatically pass any deletion discussion.

Remember that AfD is likely to continue for several days, so there is no need to panic and you can discuss the options for improving a draft version even if the article is deleted. I suggest you discuss any sources on the article talk page if you are in doubt as to whether they meet the Identifying reliable sources guidelines or are sufficient to demonstrate notability. Fæ (talk) 14:35, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mico Apostolov. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Drivenapart (talk) 14:25, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

dear, I beg to differ on your assessment that this article is not wikipedia worthy. As I have mentioned I would like to develop this article and please give me some more time in order to fully create the page. It is important that some of the economist form a small country of Macedonia are mapped, and as there are not many every ast one counts. Thus, please do not delete this page and let me branch it off in other languages, hence contribute to wikipedia. Since, this is my first article I am still trying to get around wikipedia terms and regulations. Thank you very much.

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Mico Apostolov, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. This note about Conflict of Interest has been added as helpful advice rather than a warning. Fæ (talk) 15:06, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:29, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Fæ / Laveol ( I still haven't figured out whose the message is), There is no 'conflict of interest' as it is presumed that both user accounts and corrections are of the same person. I do not have such intent, even though we might share some interests as you probably share with your Bulgarian friends (ref. to Laveol ). Thus, I would like to urge you to stay professional avoiding sabotage of newly-arrived contributors that might not share your point of view. Indeed, wikipedia has to be balanced source of information. Thank you very much.

If you feel unfairly treated, you could ask for advice on the COI Noticeboard or use one of the recommended Dispute resolution processes. For the time being I would recommend you respond or ask for clarification on the AfD discussion page and/or on the SPI page recently created where editors independent of those involved to date are likely to be able to give you further advice. Fæ (talk) 16:54, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mico Apostolov

A tag has been placed on Mico Apostolov, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 19:07, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that this article was deleted via a deletion discussion and is now tagged for deletion because it was recreated after such deletion and is substantially similar to the deleted article. If you object to the deletion please take it up with deletion review. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 19:16, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Mico Apostolov, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 19:30, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive comments.
The next time you make a personal attack, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Accusations of racism against other editors as in this comment on my talk page are considered unacceptable. Fæ (talk) 20:50, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Mico Apostolov

A tag has been placed on Mico Apostolov requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Hairhorn (talk) 02:28, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warning for sock puppetry

Please do not abuse multiple accounts like you clearly did as evidenced at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/8MA8. If you do that again, then your editing privileges will be revoked for sock puppetry. Regards, –MuZemike 21:09, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organization. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Laveol ^T 18:57, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Further usage of sockpuppets

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/8MA8. Thank you.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for sockpuppetry and edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid ^(Talk) 20:25, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

8MA8 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

79.126.239.8 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Sockpuppetry and edit warring. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/8MA8

Blocking administrator: Elockid (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: This is not an autoblock; you are directly blocked for sockpuppetry and edit-warring. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:10, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]