User talk:9 to 8

This account is a sockpuppet of GENIUS(4th power) (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Welcome!

Hello, 9 to 8, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Adlerbot (talk) 23:15, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CREEP

The relevant policy regarding your request for a source to prove that shampoo is indeed a hair care product is Avoid instruction creep. The policy on citing sources applies only to claims that are likely to be challenged, which this is not. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 03:25, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Troll elsewhere. ⇦REDVERS⇨ Say NO to Commons bullying 08:05, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

9 to 8 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As I have been trying to ask Daedulus969 without sucess, what makes me trolling?

Decline reason:

That's not a reason to be unblocked. Knock it off or I'm disabling your talk page access. Ricky81682 (talk) 09:04, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

9 to 8 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe my above request is plain and simple. Since "trolling" was in fact the reason for my block, and I don't believe it has been justified, surely any admin would be able to prove to me how I have been "trolling" if this block truly is justified.

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but you're just being silly at this point. I don't see that wasting time with any other unblock requests is productive. Kuru (talk) 20:11, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.