User talk:A Wider Lens

Potential conflict of interest[edit]

Hi, welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently made edits to Stella O'Malley. While it may be coincidental, your username, A Wider Lens, is the name of a podcast run by Stella O'Malley. If you are Ms. O'Malley, please be aware that editing articles about yourself or people/organizations you are connected to may represent a conflict of interest. Thank you and happy editing! 2603:6000:B240:1B0:528:532A:6CB8:E1C7 (talk) 19:37, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am a huge fan of that podcast, hence the name. Not Stella herself, she is busy enough with more important stuff than editing wikipedia, i'd say, hahaha! A Wider Lens (talk) 10:21, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are the same IP that erased relevant info on the Skoptic Syndrome page, trying to hide it's connection to Eunuch and WPATH and fetish/gender identity disorder. This looks like no coincidence in relation to your question above. Apparantly you are aware of Stella's concerns about the eunuch gender identity inclusion in WPATH's SOC-8. For other readers: WPATH Files was released and caused a stir about that org and SOC-8. Particularly the Eunuch chapter is controversial and it's connection to the Eunuch Archive, which is a fetish site focused on Skoptic syndrome/Eunuchism. This site features about 4000 pages tagged with stories about castration with minors involved. Please be aware of contributors that are trying to protect/hide the dark side of Eunuchism. A Wider Lens (talk) 10:28, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting for other wikipedians: https://bsky.app/profile/jessdkant.bsky.social/post/3koh3cyq7ca2t I am not Stella. A Wider Lens (talk) 10:39, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, A Wider Lens, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Your Friendly Neighborhood Sociologist ⚧ Ⓐ (talk) 16:47, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Your Friendly Neighborhood Sociologist ⚧ Ⓐ (talk) 16:47, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is A Wider Lens. Thank you. Your Friendly Neighborhood Sociologist ⚧ Ⓐ (talk) 17:04, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 01:58, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]