User talk:Aa110537

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to La glennview, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: La glennview was changed by Aa110537 (u) (t) deleting 21586 characters on 2008-12-08T18:51:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:51, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of La Glennview

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article La Glennview, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --Finngall ^talk 19:27, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article La Glennview, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. --Finngall ^talk 19:45, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to User:Finngall constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. LibLord 19:49, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User:Finngall. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. —αἰτίας •discussion• 19:50, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of La Glennview

I have nominated La Glennview, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Glennview. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Nancy ^talk 10:20, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Aa110537

A tag has been placed on User:Aa110537, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of User:Aa110537 and leave a note on [[Talk:User:Aa110537|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Schuym1 (talk) 17:28, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to La Glennview has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Cheers. _{Trance addict - Armin van Buuren - Oceanlab} 02:56, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

I am requesting a stoppage of ignorant comments from conservative older editors who reject freedom of speech. You will be reported

The recent edit you made to Wikipedia:Vandalism constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Cheers. _{Trance addict - Armin van Buuren - Oceanlab} 03:11, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to User:Finngall. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. --Finngall ^talk 03:25, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]