User talk:Aavindraa

Archives

Yo!

Dude are you still in school like after 11 years or are you in college or did you got fully educated? It's strange that you have been in school for many years 950CMR (talk) 15:59, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@950CMR: hey yeah it's a long story, but the short is I finished my undergraduate degree (Bachelor's) in 2014. I'm doing a late studies working on a Master's degree. Btw, are you related to User:245CMR or there some special meaning to "CMR"? Avindratalk 18:46, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cmr how I put it it's basically a interested in Hinduism and ancient Indian philosophies 950CMR (talk) 20:13, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@950CMR: oh cool, me too. If you are comfortable, you can drop a message on Wikipedia:WikiProject Hinduism/Participants and Wikipedia:WikiProject Hinduism/Philosophy, and see who is working on pages. Avindratalk 02:22, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Aavindraa. No, I am not related to him..245CMR.•^👥📜 13:08, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

John Diman moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, John Diman, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:39, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Diman (April 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Diman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John Diman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 09:49, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aavindraa! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Devonian Wombat (talk) 09:49, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bahulakshi Goddess

Hi. I have created a draft called Draft:Bahulakshi . Please help me to improve it. It has been declined to show as an Article due to un-encyclopaedic writing. Ayantik Basu (talk) 16:07, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:John Diman

Hello, Aavindraa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:John Diman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:03, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:John Diman

Hello, Aavindraa. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "John Diman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:43, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. Can you help me to understand why the article was removed? It is not complete, but isn't that the idea of having "stub"-class articles? John Diman appears in multiple articles and I thought it would be helpful to have a page for him. Thanks. Avindratalk 18:38, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Morton Klass has been accepted

Morton Klass, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 23:39, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed page for S.B. Keshava Swami

Hare Krishna!

I came to notice you have contributed towards a lot of Hinduism-related articles on Wikipedia. I am a well-wisher of His Holiness S.B. Keshava Swami, and was eagerly hoping he gets a Wikipedia page soon. With all his reach and work, I think he is super notable, more than enough to merit his own Wikipedia page.

He is doing some amazing work too, so a Wikipedia page would also help those who search about him learn more and better.

I was wondering if someone like you could create S.B. Keshava Swami's Wikipedia page? It would be a great service and impactful too. I am a new user, so thought I would humbly write to someone more experienced and request them to do it.

I know there is a team of volunteers who look after his website. Maybe if you contacted them, they would also be able to give you lots of references and links which they have collected over time. I have previously been in touch with them and they are quite good. Their email address can be found on the website. Thank you for considering my request. Hare Krishna! FreedomAndHappiness (talk) 23:58, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@FreedomAndHappiness: Hey, I'm happy to assist here. The first roadblock is establishing notability. On Wikipedia, this means having multiple secondary sources to corroborate the article. Not only that, but the sources must be reliable. Meanwhile, you can work on the article as a WP:DRAFT without worry of deletion, and promote it to regular article space when its ready. Additionally, the article title should be simply Keshava Swami: i.e., eliminate the S.B./Svayam Bhagavan honorific. Let me know how I can assist. Avindratalk 20:02, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]