User talk:AbdulAliAbdullah

November 2016

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Ken Ham, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. StAnselm (talk) 01:06, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Moving your page

Your page on the book Faith Versus Fact has been moved to Faith vs. Fact: Why Science and Religion are Incompatible to match the cover and title page usage of "vs.", correct the spelling of "Incompatible", and match the Wikipedia standard for title capitalization. --Nat Gertler (talk) 02:01, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions notice

Please keep in mind that the DS on pseudoscience apply to everyone who edits the topic, whether you are a believer or a skeptic.

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding pseudoscience and fringe science, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Jytdog (talk) 03:38, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Sourcing

Please read WP:Controversial articles. Please raise source quality and do not cite low quality sources like The Blaze as you did here and Epoch Times as you did here. If you keep adding negative content taking potshots at creationism etc based on poor sources like this, the community will need to remove you from the topic. Jytdog (talk) 05:53, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

copied comment here, left at my Talk page in this diff, to keep discussion together Jytdog (talk) 05:59, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi there! You said TheBlaze was not a reliable source. My apologies, I did not realize this. The very same source I used was used on Bill Nye's page (reference 69). Given that the source was acceptable on his page, I thought it would be acceptable on Ham's page as well.

As for Epoch Times, I will ensure I use better and more credible sources. AbdulAliAbdullah (talk) 05:57, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

As i noted above, you are establishing a pattern of adding negative content, broadly stated, sourced to low quality sources. This is disruptive. Please read and follow WP:NPOV and please use high quality sources. If you don't understand what high quality sources are, I suggest you stay away from topics that have discretionary sanctions. Jytdog (talk) 06:00, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Perhaps it would be best for me to do that, it would seem that I have been disrupting the process and progress for that page

AbdulAliAbdullah (talk) 06:12, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

I'll ensure my edits will adhere to the NPOV from now on AbdulAliAbdullah (talk) 02:20, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to New Atheism. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 16:48, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Trent horn

Hello AbdulAliAbdullah,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Trent horn for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

TonyBallioni (talk) 01:34, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Improving articles

If you are interested in Catholic or Christian topics, you can go to Category:Catholic Church stubs or Category:Christianity stubs. Both of those contain short articles that need improvement. Remember to make sure everything is well sourced to reliable sources. After you've improved a few articles, writing new articles will probably be easier! TonyBallioni (talk) 01:46, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you so much! Will do! AbdulAliAbdullah (talk) 01:48, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New Atheism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Wright. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, AbdulAliAbdullah. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AbdulAliAbdullah. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AbdulAliAbdullah. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)