User talk:Adellefrank
New Message! Heads up![edit]
Hello, at least one new message has been posted here: Talk:Bhagavad_Gita#Gita_Chapter_Table.21 --Tito Dutta ✉ 00:42, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
- At least another new message has been posted in same page! --Tito Dutta ✉ 02:37, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Bhagavad Gita (Peer Review)[edit]
I have listed the article for peer review here. If and when you find the time, feel free to chip in. CorrectKnowledge (talk) 17:03, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Vaccination of dogs[edit]
Hello Adellefrank. I was looking at Wikipedia:WikiProject Dogs/Assessment and note that you sought a Good Article nomination for your work on Vaccination of dogs, and have been waiting patiently since 8 July 2012. Don't wait - you can nominate it yourself at Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Instructions. You will first need to have it reviewed by any registered user who has not contributed significantly to the article. Regards, William Harris • talk • 10:07, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Adellefrank. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
WikiProject Hinduism[edit]
Hello, Adellefrank. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. We would like to introduce a newsletter to Wikiproject Hinduism. A newsletter is always help to inform recent changes in the project to project members and help for effective coordination. Now we have launched a new newsletter for the Wikiproject. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Also do not forget to contribute to the newsletter. Thank you!
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:14, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Adverse vaccine reactions in pets for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adverse vaccine reactions in pets until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.