User talk:Agfanclub

Welcome!

Hello, Agfanclub, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Andy Grammer, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Eeekster (talk) 03:09, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Andy Grammer

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Andy Grammer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Eeekster (talk) 03:09, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Andy Grammer

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Andy Grammer, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WuhWuzDat 15:36, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Andy Grammer, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:37, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, as you did at Andy Grammer, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. WuhWuzDat 15:37, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Andy Grammer

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Andy Grammer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. WuhWuzDat 15:38, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:40, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've unblocked you, as it seems the subject of the article might indeed be notable. But a bit of advice for the future - if you disagree with the deletion of an article, please place a {{hangon}} and explain on the Talk page, or if it is already deleted, discuss it with the admin who deleted it. Don't just repeatedly recreate it. Warring over an article is never the correct approach to a dispute, and is always likely to get you blocked, even if you are right. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:59, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Agfanclub (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am new here and I am sincerely trying to write this article. I contacted wikipedia and they reinstated the article. Even the person who blocked me should says that the article seems possible notable. Come on, give me a break. I'm working on getting this right, but for someone that is new here, wikipedia is very unusual and difficult to use. We need voices from all kinds of people on here, not just wikipedia experts. I would have appreciated some help and guidance on the matter from fellow wikipedia authors, but instead they were insistant on being on a power trip and using their power unfairly. I am going to write an official paper letter to wikipedia. I also added the words 'hang on' to the page, but I was still deleted.

Decline reason:

As soon as I saw "fascist" I said "this person won't work well here". You might want to rephrase this request. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 16:07, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi. As the person who blocked you and who then said the article seems possibly notable, I had already unblocked you - but you were subsequently reblocked by someone else for a username violation. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:13, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your name

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the username you have chosen (Agfanclub) seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of a group, company or website.

There are two issues with this:

It is possible that you have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, you must exercise great caution when editing on topics related to your organization.
Your account cannot represent a group of people. You may wish to create a new account with a username that represents only you. Alternatively, you may consider changing your username to avoid giving the impression that your personal account is being used for promotional purposes.

Regardless of whether you change your name or create a new account, you are not exempted from the guidelines concerning editing where you have a conflict of interest. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. The article in question is Andy Grammer. Thank you. WuhWuzDat 16:00, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; you are welcome to create a new account with a username that represents only you. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline. If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you.

--Orange Mike | Talk 16:07, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Agfanclub (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did edit my statement and rephrase, but it was rejected in a matter of seconds. I still feel i am being treated unfairly and I don't deserve to be blocked. Why is there no jury to review request? Why does one person get to make the decision?

Decline reason:

As I said above, I had unblocked you when I learned that the subject might be notable, and I gave you some advice on avoiding similar problems in the future. You have now been re-blocked because your name violates username policy, so you will need to show willingness to address that to be unblocked again -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:19, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

And please, place new messages and unblock requests here at the bottom of the page, to keep things in order. If you keep adding them at the top, it becomes near impossible to understand the sequence of events. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:20, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Grammer's article

When you get back into editing, I've probably got the article to a point where its not going to be deleted again. Hope that helps. Syrthiss (talk) 16:23, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} how do i become unblocked so i can change my username

You should be good now to do it. There was still an autoblock in the system. Just create a new account and you should be good. If you still find yourself prevented from doing that, if you reply here we can look into it further. Hope this helps. Syrthiss (talk) 17:53, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]