Hello, Airvenus! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Nomoskedasticity (talk) 21:22, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have reverted your edits today because of Wikipedia's policy on no original research. This can be a difficult policy to understand at first, so please slow down and discuss your edits on the article talk page (don't simply repeat them). Nomoskedasticity (talk) 18:30, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The edits are not against the 'no original research' policy. The title of the section edited then was "Academic Criticism" (now titled, Psychology Today controversy). Therefore any mention of statements he made in his article should show that there are actual studies that are contrary to his statements. To post a quote from his article but not show an article from an actual study that is contrary to what Kanazawa wrote without a study doesn't do right by the title "Academic Criticism" or "Psychology Today controversy."Airvenus (talk) 19:29, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
