User talk:Ajaystarrer

October 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. DMacks (talk) 13:02, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Sonam Kapoor. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Diffs: [1] Your "affectionate" write-up of Sonam Kapoor is not appropriate tone for an encyclopedia. We're not here to write puff-pieces for people. Wikipedia strives to be an honest academic reference, and content must be written from a neutral point of view and in a professional tone befitting an encyclopedia. Content about how Kapoor isn't afraid to express her honest opinion in public is absurd for an article's lead, as is non-neutral language like "flop" and "highly acclaimed". You should familiarize yourself with some featured articles and maybe WP:YFA before writing more content. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:41, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Bipasha Basu, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 00:15, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sonam Kapoor

Hi, I understand your enthusiasm about the article, but please refrain from adding those tedious texts which resemble a lot of other articles of Indian actresses. You see, this is an FA-class biography that means that it is one of the best articles in Wikipedia, but that way it cannot be considered an excellent article. FrB.TG (talk) 17:50, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Raveena Tandon. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:52, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:17, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ajaystarrer, re: this, there was a very obvious embedded note in the |birth_date= parameter instructing you to provide a reference. There's no excuse for you not providing a reference. If you treat articles this casually after your block expires, future blocks will be longer. You're not helping to make the encyclopedia stronger by adding unsourced or improperly sourced content. And once again, your commentary about a person's outspoken personality has no place in articles. You were told about this in early 2016. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:53, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ajaystarrer. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for disruptive editing including repeated removal of needed templates. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 13:11, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ajaystarrer. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]