User talk:Ajmalmiyan

Welcome!

Hello, Ajmalmiyan, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Untitled Mammootty Madhupal Project, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! NeemNarduni2 (talk) 13:56, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Untitled Mammootty Madhupal Project

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Untitled Mammootty Madhupal Project requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 13:56, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Untitled Mammootty Madhupal Film for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Untitled Mammootty Madhupal Film is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Mammootty Madhupal Film until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Charles Turing (talk) 18:55, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of highest-grossing Indian films, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diff: [1] The changes you made are not consistent with the sources in the articles. This is problematic because such changes are indistinguishable from vandalism. Please be sure to include reliable sources when making these sorts of changes. Please see WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources for some examples of sources typically considered acceptable for Indian film articles. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 08:54, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blogs as references

Hi there, re: your edit here, per WP:UGC we do not use blogs as references, since anyone with an internet connection can create a blog and call himself an expert on any given subject. We're only interested in what reliable published sources with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy have to say. Other examples of insufficient sources include discussion forums, website comments, unverified Twitter accounts, IMDb, even Wikipedia itself. Unless you are in a position to explain who runs the site, why they should be considered an expert in Indian cinema, and argue that they have an established reputation, you should stick to mainstream sources like major newspapers, magazines and their online presences. (The Hindu, Hindustani Times, Times of India, etc.) There is no indication that kboupdates.com qualifies as a reliable source. Please also familiarize yourself with our general guidelines on reliable sources as well as our stance on user-generated content. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:31, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Virgil van Dijk. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Qed237 (talk) 12:31, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Mark Sifneos, you may be blocked from editing. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 20:22, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]